west didsblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Oct 2011
- Messages
- 32,426
Don’t think you’ll catch many with that. It’s too silly.I think he’d make an excellent PM.
Don’t think you’ll catch many with that. It’s too silly.I think he’d make an excellent PM.
I think he would make a good PM. No skin off my nose if others think different. Couldn’t give 2 shits.Don’t think you’ll catch many with that. It’s too silly.
What cartoon character would you have as chancellor if Buzz Killington became PM?I think he would make a good PM. No skin off my nose if others think different. Couldn’t give 2 shits.
Not strictly true. A prime number is any natural number that cannot be formed by multiplying two smaller natural numbers. That's why the number 1 isn't prime (it would be under your definition).263 pence - a prime number divisible only by itself and one.
It would be under your definition as well. The real definition is that a prime number has two divisors - 1 and itself. 1 only has one divisor, hence it's not prime.Not strictly true. A prime number is any natural number that cannot be formed by multiplying two smaller natural numbers. That's why the number 1 isn't prime (it would be under your definition).
I think he looks like Postman Pat to be honest.What cartoon character would you have as chancellor if Buzz Killington became PM?
Maybe Mort Goldman?
It wouldn’t because 1 is the smallest natural number.It would be under your definition as well. The real definition is that a prime number has two divisors - 1 and itself. 1 only has one divisor, hence it's not prime.
So it cannot be formed by multiplying two smaller ones which would suggest it is prime according to your definition.It wouldn’t because 1 is the smallest natural number.