Jadon Sancho

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm talking about Denayer.

First team involvement requires minutes on the pitch & Sancho has to earn that. Nothing wrong so far, with how we have treated Sancho the problem is that he should be convinced City is the best place for him, with all the investment we have put in, but he is either wavering, or going.

I don't think a kid wavers, if he's convinced he has a shot at playing for Pep Guardiola in the near future.

But if he looks at people like Barker & Denayer, who performed to.the highest level without getting a sniff, why not go somewhere else ?

Ah right, your right about that I blame pellegrini who made the call to keep Demechellis
 
Ah right, your right about that I blame pellegrini who made the call to keep Demechellis

Indeed, but Jack Byrne excelled in Holland & at City previously & never got a sniff after Pellegrini had gone, so it didn't change.

The latest is Pat Roberts. He HAS to be given a chance imo. If he can't force his way in, at least he's been given the natural lift his performances deserve.

It doesn't matter if he then gets moved on.
 
Is there a problem with the way the academy is run?


Not imo.

I'm not sure about the raggy geezer we put in charge but I rate Wicox very highly.

I think the academy is fantastic & is producing scores of players good enough to be tried out in our first team. Then they hit a brick wall, with managers unwilling to take a gamble & using their lack of experience v adult players as an excuse.

But in most cases, it is actually an excuse.

The kids don't need to be first choice, just to get on the pitch here & there.

With so much money available, the managers just spend it instead. It's easier.
 
There need to be a new rule that every club should have at least 1 youth team player on the bench every game. Id go further and make a rule that 1 youth team player should start in the first 11 of every premier team but that will never happen.
 
Not imo.

I'm not sure about the raggy geezer we put in charge but I rate Wicox very highly.

I think the academy is fantastic & is producing scores of players good enough to be tried out in our first team. Then they hit a brick wall, with managers unwilling to take a gamble & using their lack of experience v adult players as an excuse.

But in most cases, it is actually an excuse.

The kids don't need to be first choice, just to get on the pitch here & there.

With so much money available, the managers just spend it instead. It's easier.


Surely Pep will give them a chance this season? I simply don't understand if the answer is right in front of their faces and the Chairman / Owner wants the academy to feed the first team then why would this philosophy / system be continuously ignored and disrespected?
 
Surely Pep will give them a chance this season? I simply don't understand if the answer is right in front of their faces and the Chairman / Owner wants the academy to feed the first team then why would this philosophy / system be continuously ignored and disrespected?

Because at City, the manager is in control & the club backs him.

I am hoping Pep will start to bring through kids, as I think the whole thing was designed for him to do that, but we have a problem now imo, that the academy has produced nothing for the first team & it's something we need to put straight by getting a few on the pitch, even if it's just late in games.
 
Because at City, the manager is in control & the club backs him.

I am hoping Pep will start to bring through kids, as I think the whole thing was designed for him to do that, but we have a problem now imo, that the academy has produced nothing for the first team & it's something we need to put straight by getting a few on the pitch, even if it's just late in games.

If Pep was intending to bring through young players and focus on the long-term of the club, last season was clearly the time when that needed to be shown and I'm afraid but based on how he handled last season, there's little evidence to suggest that will be the case for the foreseeable future especially now that winning trophies will clearly be of a high priority this season. How many teams have operated with that long-term view of bringing through young players and been successful trophy-wise as a result. Of the last 10-15 years, I can only think of Barca with pep (with a golden generation of young players that is likely never to be seen again), dortmund and athletico madrid. Outside of those teams the most successful teams of the past 10 years have all been teams that operated with a short-term view of winning trophies and that is what I believe the current owners at city prioritise more than anything.

I genuinely thought bringing Pep in would signal the change from that focus into a more long-term one with bringing through youth/academy players but last season proved to me without doubt that it won't be the case. More talented, established young players are going to be bought for high fees while the ones already here are going to be moved on for some profit possibly with incentives installed in their transfers. That's just the way its going to be with the current climate of the game where money reigns supreme and you're going to be quickly left behind by other big teams who are all about winning trophies if you don't focus on the short-term. Football has changed drastically from the last 10 years with TV money where bottom half clubs can now splash upwards of 30 million on players and the likes of payet can end up at west ham. The competition level is not the same so you have to move with the times or risk being left behind. I would wish that not to be the case but I'm afraid that's what's happened as Real have proven the last couple of years in europe as well as chelsea domestically.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.