mexico1970
Well-Known Member
Sancho looks like he's a disciplinary problem and a ball ache to manage, he'll suit the rags and bring more trouble for their dressing room. The videos I have seen him in make Lingard look normal.
Sancho looks like he's a disciplinary problem and a ball ache to manage, he'll suit the rags and bring more trouble for their dressing room. The videos I have seen him in make Lingard look normal.
Steady on.Sancho looks like he's a disciplinary problem and a ball ache to manage, he'll suit the rags and bring more trouble for their dressing room. The videos I have seen him in make Lingard look normal.
The difference between Sancho and Angelino says it all. We were more than happy to have one back and we're seemingly more than happy not to have the other one back, even with the clear difference in ability.We’re not interested in Sancho returning and Guardiola made that very clear in a public interview. That was interesting in itself, as it signalled to Sancho that he’d burnt his bridges with us. It also signalled to Dortmund that we would not participate in any auction for him, partly because we disliked the initial approach that lured the player and partly because we don’t want to be used so that Dortmund can profit even further. Finally, it signalled to our neighbours that we would not compete with them for Sancho, thus giving them a clear run at the player, safe in the knowledge that they are not going to be outbid. They’ll still pay a lot, but not top price.
Question is, will that lot reciprocate and publicly state that they have no interest in signing Koulibaly? If they did, it would suggest there might be a gentleman’s agreement in place.
Zero trust In them may actually be more than we have in Napoli. ;-)That last line....come on Gab, even if we'd spoken, like UEFA they're not for being trusted and I'm sure the club would have zero trust in them as well.
The difference between Sancho and Angelino says it all. We were more than happy to have one back and we're seemingly more than happy not to have the other one back, even with the clear difference in ability.
The difference between Sancho and Angelino says it all. We were more than happy to have one back and we're seemingly more than happy not to have the other one back, even with the clear difference in ability.
Why? I'm sure we've got far more important issues than trying to get that shite to pay a few quid more for a player. We're not interested, we don't have to lower ourselves to their standard.Clearly it would be in our best interests to drive the Sancho fee up? Could the rags drive the koulibaly fee up? I very much doubt it if there balls deep for Sancho there will only be enough money left to sign mediocre players from clubs like say Swansea.
Why would he sign a contract if he knew that's what the plan was? It's not football manager on the PC.I agree that their characters are as different as their abilities, but if we had had the same contract mechanism with Sancho as we had for Angelino, I’m sure we’d have been interested in bringing him back with a view to selling him on again. Quickly.