City Glory While Others Fade said:
Your comments are bizarre
That's because you're a reactionary idiot who is incapable of reading a clearly worded post.
That's a bit personal and unnecessary!
City Glory While Others Fade said:
.....I never said he hadn't already played for England
You said everything he has is thanks to City. Which is clearly fucking horseshit. He didn't come through our academy, so we can't claim to have made him a footballer. He won his England caps long before he signed for us, so we can't claim credit for that either.
In club football all he has won is with City, as football is a team game James Milner's club success has more to do with City's 25 man squad who he won trophies with than which academy that he trained to play football at!
City Glory While Others Fade said:
I give you a list of all the reasons why he should stay with City and you appear to refer to the medals Milner has won with City as trivial.
You're putting words in my mouth. The medals aren't trivial, but they aren't the be all and end all. At this stage in his career, playing regularly each week is obviously more important to Milner than winning more medals.
For premier league players in the top 4 clubs who are financially secure the medals and trophies are exactly what it's all about. He is playing regular each week, which other club would give Milner guarantees on playing time ?
City Glory While Others Fade said:
Your suggestion that Milner has suffered as a player with us is utter tosh, you've been reading the Sun too much sat on the toilet. Are you really suggesting he should have stayed at Villa winning no trophies and earning £500k as oppose to £4 mill per year with us. He's also had the benefit of training and being looked after by a much better club which will no doubt of improved him as a player. These are all reasons why he should stay, if he leaves it will be for money and I can guarantee that his years at City will have been his most successful.
Again you haven't really read or understood what I have said. I'll repeat it because you're clearly having difficulty in understanding simple words.
His reputation has suffered. At Villa he was the main man and was often the man of the match and getting rave reviews every week. Which combined with his nationality is obviously what drew him to our attention. These days he mostly starts from the bench. If he's mentioned in the media its often with the tag of "forgotten man"
Other fans dismiss him as a bench warmer. His reputation has suffered.
City Glory While Others Fade said:
He was a big fish in a small pond....he choose to move to City knowing he'd be a fish in a big pond that's gots bigger as we have improved and won more trophies. He is playing regularly for us these days and doing very well. Your repeating the media assertions again that they use for every young player at City because were not the darlings of the moment. How has his reputation suffered when the likes of Arsenal, Liverpool and Roma have been linked with him, were all these clubs in for him when City bought him?
You need to sort out where your loyalties lie, stop believing the media hype that City have ruined every young player that's played for us and get behind the club.
I know exactly where my loyalties lie, I've been a City fan for over 40 years and I don't need a runny nosed little cock snot like you telling me. I'm just able to see beyond your juvenile rantings.