BringBackSwales
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 31,952
Why would we loan Kalvin rather than sell him? Pep clearly doesn’t intend to play him in the future and a loan just causes Kalvin’s value to diminish. Makes no sense to me
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
January window
- Thread starter Ashleymcduff
- Start date
Why would we loan Kalvin rather than sell him? Pep clearly doesn’t intend to play him in the future and a loan just causes Kalvin’s value to diminish. Makes no sense to me He is a player who's career could completely bomb.
Always overrated for me and now a player whose confidence must have taken a huge dent, we must take a permanent transfer in this window, a loan would be foolish.
Last edited:
Still rumored to be the same 43m release clause.Did Williams not just sign a new contract though so I would imagine a big jump in the release clause?
there is a chance, that he regains confidence and has a stellar second half of the season and we can get more for him, although sadly i don't see that happeningWhy would we loan Kalvin rather than sell him? Pep clearly doesn’t intend to play him in the future and a loan just causes Kalvin’s value to diminish. Makes no sense to me
somehow i believe there will be few signing.
BlueindianNewcity
Well-Known Member
So they won't miss him ;)still weeks away from being fit, hasnt even made his debut for chelsea yet.
Holcombe bloo
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Mar 2009
- Messages
- 1,588
Depends what big Dave sayssomehow i believe there will be few signing.
richards30
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 May 2009
- Messages
- 26,702
I wouldn't be surprised if we went for Ian Maatsan from Chelsea in January.
He'd be cheap as he is out of contract in summer.
any need for him though mate?
We need a left back don’t weany need for him though mate?