BringBackSwales
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 33,650
Why would we loan Kalvin rather than sell him? Pep clearly doesn’t intend to play him in the future and a loan just causes Kalvin’s value to diminish. Makes no sense to me
Why would we loan Kalvin rather than sell him? Pep clearly doesn’t intend to play him in the future and a loan just causes Kalvin’s value to diminish. Makes no sense to me He is a player who's career could completely bomb.
Still rumored to be the same 43m release clause.Did Williams not just sign a new contract though so I would imagine a big jump in the release clause?
there is a chance, that he regains confidence and has a stellar second half of the season and we can get more for him, although sadly i don't see that happeningWhy would we loan Kalvin rather than sell him? Pep clearly doesn’t intend to play him in the future and a loan just causes Kalvin’s value to diminish. Makes no sense to me
So they won't miss him ;)still weeks away from being fit, hasnt even made his debut for chelsea yet.
Depends what big Dave sayssomehow i believe there will be few signing.
I wouldn't be surprised if we went for Ian Maatsan from Chelsea in January.
He'd be cheap as he is out of contract in summer.
We need a left back don’t weany need for him though mate?