mexico1970
Well-Known Member
It's worth the license fee just to watch the delightful Sophie Raworth read the news
You don't pay the license fee you're a flippin' American ;)
It's worth the license fee just to watch the delightful Sophie Raworth read the news
I don't, but there again I don't need to because the same people who love it post it on here. The same reason applies to GBnews, Twitter and any other form of emotional crutch some people use that they feel the need to share.
It's all here :)
You seem to be wanting the conversation of the BBC to be dragged into this thread, calling for the destruction of it based on Jenas sending some naughty text messages.
Enough to make the **** ashamed, so it must be bad!I haven't commented that much on Jenus because we don't even know what he has done yet.
Enough to make the **** ashamed, so it must be bad!
Is sending a dick pic (that's an example not an accusation) a criminal offence if sending to an adult?Agree it must be bad, but we still as yet don't know. Although not enough to be charged as yet?
Which begs the question if what he has done is that bad why hasn't he been charged?
Is sending a dick pic (that's an example not an accusation) a criminal offence if sending to an adult?
Lucrezia Millarini for me MES, though she’s on ITV.It's worth the license fee just to watch the delightful Sophie Raworth read the news
Just commenting on some of the nonsense posted on here, like the straw argument about the nonce ridden Catholic church used to validate the amount of wrong 'uns in the BBC.
I haven't commented that much on Jenus because we don't even know what he has done yet.
Why is it a strawman? every organisation has wrong'uns- it isn't always a institutional issue as you desperately trying to make it to.