@BluePhil8 said:
In terms of attributes, Hart might be better than Pantilimon.
But when Pantilimon played the defence looked settled and we conceded very few goals.
If Pellegrini had a back bone he would have told the media to fuck off and never reinstated Hart who is now back to leaking shit goals for fun. He is lucky Minone chucked a goal in tonight because he has been SHIT the last two matches.
Jesus Christ, Pantilimon is a terrible goalkeeper. No matter your feelings about Joe Hart, Pantilimon is worse.
Remember when he palmed the ball to Scott Dann in the FA Cup against Blackburn? Or when he took 35 decades to get down to Borini's shot in the League Cup final? Or when he flapped at every single low cross from the right hand side? Or when he was beaten by two identical goals scored by Theo Walcott and Osvaldo in the space of a couple of weeks? He's good to have in net for an early round cup game or against teams who enjoy lofting the ball into the area, but that's it. He's got zero technique with his shot-stopping, isn't much better than Hart with his kicking minus a couple of moments and is overall a much worse keeper. And to say that Hart is now "back to leaking shit goals for fun" is taking away just how good a finish that was from Wickham. Hart was at fault, along with Kompany, for Sterling's goal on Sunday - but that's it. The corner Liverpool scored from came from a fantastic Hart save after a Gerrard header and we all know Coutinho's goal came from one mistake from a man who's not Joe Hart. Remember Podolski's one-on-one that Hart saved with his legs? Imagine if that had gone in, eh?
He's not a world class keeper, but to say he's "back to leaking shit goals for fun" after a couple of dodgy results is unfair. And
to imply that Pantilimon is the better goalkeeper? Well, that's too far.