It correlates exactely doesnt it?How does that correlate to him appearing to deliberately ignore what he knew Pep was wanting from him when playing the 2nd half against Le Ars
it's political and i don't buy that he's needs a sweeper keeper and can play from the back joe hart is great with his feet and kicking and i would say the best in the league at both. but in the back ground joe hart is a main part of the old guard and got some power and respect from players and under pellegrini he was doing whatever he likes and picked the games he wanted to play even the league cup final joe hart let willy play in my book
joe may need a move to fresh him up and start a new and a clean break would give him something to show his new club but i will say joe hart is a winner and will only move if he feels the club don't want him and the new club are a winning club with champions league football
I recon you're wrong on all counts there mateit's political and i don't buy that he's needs a sweeper keeper and can play from the back joe hart is great with his feet and kicking and i would say the best in the league at both. but in the back ground joe hart is a main part of the old guard and got some power and respect from players and under pellegrini he was doing whatever he likes and picked the games he wanted to play even the league cup final joe hart let willy play in my book
joe may need a move to fresh him up and start a new and a clean break would give him something to show his new club but i will say joe hart is a winner and will only move if he feels the club don't want him and the new club are a winning club with champions league football
yup fair enough, it does stink tbh, if it is true.What I meant by attitude was his attitude towards adapting. Whether he would rather conspire to undermine the manager rather than change his game to fit into the new system. We all know what happened to Mancini when he tried to assert his authority on the players. It's quite likely it would happen again if it was allowed.
Makes no difference,both are dodgy.Yes I agree regarding Bravo. But until then Joe>Willy for me.
You always talk with such scorn about him. He hasn't asked to leave, he may not, so why besmirch his legacy beforehand? That's the bit I don't get off people, it leads the to believe that you simply don't like him.Which shows where his loyalties lie. He's essentially going to quit without putting up a fight because he's more concerned about losing his England shirt than staying at City.
it's political and i don't buy that he's needs a sweeper keeper and can play from the back joe hart is great with his feet and kicking and i would say the best in the league at both.
Yes I agree regarding Bravo. But until then Joe>Willy for me.
No. I sound like a realist. You sound like a kid with adhd. "the jury's still out" "Pep's done nothing so far" "Pep hasn't delivered yet". Fuck's sake Tony, what have you been sniffing?Only thing I expect is not relegation nowadays, getting a pot is a bonus!!
@SWP, Sam mate, you sound proper raggy dude.