Both as they synonymous.I find that slightly ambiguous, do you mean "he is the better keeper for us and an upgrade for us"?
But not the manager nor the goal keeper coach who has worked with both.1. I'm not saying Hart is better than Bravo. 2.I'm not saying that he is better because these articles say so.
What I am saying that you and others saying Bravo is an upgrade is disputed by many. Not just me.
What about PSG? Or Russian clubs that can comfortably afford his wages?
1. I'm not saying Hart is better than Bravo. 2.I'm not saying that he is better because these articles say so.
What I am saying that you and others saying Bravo is an upgrade is disputed by many. Not just me.
But not the manager nor the goal keeper coach who has worked with both.
I think Hart has been good enough for us until now. I also thinks that Hart is not good enough a keeper to take us to the next level that is demanded by PepBoth as they synonymous.
Whilst we are on lists:
ntonio 'Condor' Rojas.
Roberto Rojas is proud to share the title with Bravo. In December 2015 he said: "I place him as one of the two best goalkeepers in the world with Manuel Neuer."
I can post a quote of English legend Shilton saying Hart isn't as good as people think he is, for balance like.
I agree with that sentiment.I think Hart has been good enough for us until now. I also thinks that Hart is not good enough a keeper to take us to the next level that is demanded by Pep
Well just because he may be the better keeper for us and an upgrade for us in our specific circumstances doesn't necessarily mean that he is the better keeper overall. As I said, it is at least debatable who is the better keeper and no doubt there will be plenty around (not just City fans) who think Hart is a better all round keeper. Hopefully Bravo will take to the unique demands of the Premier League better and more quickly than Pep thought Hart could take to the unique demands of Pep's way of playing.Both as they synonymous.