marcoboogers
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Aug 2009
- Messages
- 734
Apparently JH knows already where he's going. Maybe leave the announcement till after the weekends games? Less distraction
In England?Apparently JH knows already where he's going. Maybe leave the announcement till after the weekends games? Less distraction
In England?
It's always sad when players you have an attachment to leave the club, but I've been surprised by the reaction of some.
I like Hart, and he's been an integral part of the club for the last decade, but I don't think he has been particularly badly treated. Players come and go all the time, it's the nature of the business. And from what I understand he was told at the beginning of summer that he wouldn't be first choice, so his agent has had plenty of time to arrange a move.
Guardiola's perfectly entitled to choose which players he wants, and I'm happy to trust his judgement for now. If City improve as a result then I'm all in favour. That's the only thing that really matters to me.
HahahaGoing off tevez and aguero at least a few years
An ITK?Honestly , I don't know. A lad I know , who used to work at city is a good pal of his . He mentioned what I have said above but remained silent on to JH destination
Because Hart isn't Ter Stegen.I personally think Pep has the right to bring in who he wants as goal keeper. And if that man is bravo I back him 100%.
But what I disagree with is the treatment of Joe hart. To say if he doesn't get another club before transfer window ends he will rotate as second choice with caballero and gunn just isn't right.
Let's be honest, bravo isn't getting any younger and has had his fair share of injuries. Why couldn't bravo and hart rotate like barca do with their goal keepers. No offence but caballero is not good enough in any way shape or form.
An ITK?
Honestly , I don't know. A lad I know , who used to work at city is a good pal of his . He mentioned what I have said above but remained silent on to JH destination