GaudinoMotors said:Harsh but ultimately true - problem is Willy isn't much better.dubblue said:Hart is just an extremely average error prone keeper. He has the very odd great game but he's not good enough for us.
Blue Haze said:Joe Hart's Dandruff said:Our corners are a fucking shambles. The amount of times they don't get past the first man is unacceptable. Getting paid 100+k a week and not being able to take a decent corner consistently is a fucking joke. Not a funny one.
It's why I fucking hate outswinging corners. Happened at least once last season too.
You miss on one and it's a jailbreak the other way.
LoveCity said:1 shot, 1 goal. It's too often the case with Joe Hart whereas a few years ago he could make 3-4 wonder saves per game.
I have been saying since summer that Willy has been a better keeper than Joe over the last 2 years. Joe will always get preferential treatment because he's English and also Willy's baptism of fire against Arsenal didn't help, but IMO he is a better goalkeeper based solely on the evidence of the past 2 years. He also doesn't need so much time to distribute that the entire opposition is back in two organised lines.
Len Rum said:If Joe had saved that 'back pass' from which Diouf scored then his inability to deal with crosses and his poor distribution would have been forgotten and forgiven ,but he didn't and so for me it's an easy decision to drop him and pick Willy. After all why did we buy Caballero if not to provide competition to Joe.
Ultimately though we need a top quality keeper, competition between two average keepers is not good enough at this level.
BlueDeadHead said:LoveCity said:1 shot, 1 goal. It's too often the case with Joe Hart whereas a few years ago he could make 3-4 wonder saves per game.
I have been saying since summer that Willy has been a better keeper than Joe over the last 2 years. Joe will always get preferential treatment because he's English and also Willy's baptism of fire against Arsenal didn't help, but IMO he is a better goalkeeper based solely on the evidence of the past 2 years. He also doesn't need so much time to distribute that the entire opposition is back in two organised lines.
Agree. IMO Willy was brought in to play. It is just a matter of time till Pellers gives him a run. The question is...was yesterday the mistake that gives Willy his chance?
BlueAnorak said:GaudinoMotors said:Harsh but ultimately true - problem is Willy isn't much better.dubblue said:Hart is just an extremely average error prone keeper. He has the very odd great game but he's not good enough for us.
WTF "Willy Isn't much better?" Do me a favour he's far worse than Hart.
He was poor pre-season and was total toss in the Community Shield.
Give me Hart any day of the week.
lancs blue said:razinho said:Faith.
[video]http://youtu.be/A96rNAzQkHQ[/video]
Unfortunately in the nearly 2 years since that night he's not just stood still he has actually declined as a keeper IMO.