MaineRoadBlue said:waspish said:Wretched Vengeance said:On Goals on Sunday Brad Friedel explained the reasoning behind always having a wall. I can't full remember exactly what he said but it made obvious sense.
But I will admit I also thought, like a few on here today have, is a wall really necessary. A longstanding Premier League pro gave an emphatic 'yes' so that will do for me :)
He said the pace of the ball in either corner would probably beat him
Please read again, I put a defender inside each post. It not a free shot. Between the ball at around 22 yards plus are 11 of our players and probably 3 to 4 of theirs.
The only option is to hit the ball hard and this can only be done with an obvious run up. Villa's scorer simply clipped the ball over a static wall past a flat footed Hart into an empty net. The only element he had to achieve was a clip. And with regard to how many free kick experts are in military football or any branch of current football I think you would be surprised!
The wall, upon it's inception was considered a useful tool as the ball we played with in the 70's were heavy, and the pitches heavier. The concept that a player could clear the wall and get the ball back down was unheard of.
With modern ball, boots, quality boots and better surfaces it is now a common technique that players easily master. ffs, even Yaya has!
The problem now is that a power shot seldom stays low. Is it not obvious then people that we need to adapt and ask the opposition to master a low shot through a crowd of players from an obvious taker.
I rest my case. The wall has had its day.
It also helps if your goalkeeper isn't only motivated by being in the England squad.