OrigamiNinja
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 9,648
I’ve just pointed out he won the initial header (clearing the initial danger) in the build up to United’s goal, where they had to pass to the other side to create the chance because he was properly defending his side. And if he had engaged Rashford 40 yards out, he would have likely been done for pace (just like if Dinho or Nico did it), and you would have complained he can’t defend. He was doing what he should have, trying to stop the quick forward progress to allow for his teammates to get back in to position to help him. He is not at fault for that strategy not working or Bernardo coming in from the side to fell Rashford.
But it is obvious your opinion is set, he’ll always be **** and to blame for our problems in defence, regardless of his performances, so there’s no reason to continue to debate it.
No, I would have been absolutely shocked and stunned that he attempted to make a tackle but yet again he chooses to not get involved.
We've just spent the past few years watching Vincent Kompany and now he’s gone we are watching John Stones. You’ve been watching one of the best ever in his position in the Premier League, you have seen what a top-class centre back looks like, it should be an absolute piece of piss to assess that Stones is levels below what is required.