John Stones

Status
Not open for further replies.
Telegraph saying we're going to spend £50m on John fucking Stones?

We've lost our fucking minds. Absolute insanity.

Still remember a lot of people rationalising this move in May because we'd apparently be able to get him for circa £30m because his value would have dropped coming off the back of an utterly terrible season.

I feel sick, I really do.

Overpriced, overrated, overhyped. Fifty fucking million. Jesus Christ.

You must be loaded spending 50m.
 
not a rag smart ass

Hmmmm, but
Skeptical+house+never+seen+on+fj+if+repost+sorry+but_3bab87_4794073.jpg

as to whether you are blue.
You don't seem to want City to spend any money and everything is about saving 'face' with others.
 
I feel sick because we've just missed out on a real talent who would have strengthened us, and now we're going to have months of tedious back and forth with Everton only to inevitably be taken to the cleaners by Kenwright in August for a currently bang average player who may eventually amount to something worth relying on.

It's a kick in the balls, and I don't think I'm alone in feeling this way.
It's still rather sad.
 
Just when I was coming round to the decision of signing Stones I read that it may be £50m to get him.

I know it's not our money but ffs how many times do we need to overspend on defenders. Mangala, Otamendi and maybe Stones have cost more than David Silva!
 
It's not our money. The Sheikh will laugh if he reads our thread and moaning about how people think he should spend his money. He can probably make back the money in the time it takes him to have tea. The only time we should be concerned about the money is for FFP. But FFP is dead now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.