John Stones

[RandomJ]

Maybe we asked them to play him while we're sorting out the deal? He will have needed to get match fit anyway.

 

[Machiavelli]

Than Lescott who is supposed to have been a liability & a ripoff ( one of the best cbs City have ever had).

The hype is what I don't like.

If we can make a top player out of him then fine. Right now, he isn't one.

I think the hype is silly as well and I agree on Lescott, if we don't sign Stones I'm sure folk will backtrack à la Pogba.

 

[Eric Wirral]

Suprised Everton played him yesterday then if that is true if only add ons to sort out . It would be a massive risk if he would have got injured for a long period of time

Perhaps City wanted him to play?

 

[uwe rosler 28]

Both clubs need him fit so no reason not to play him

 

[Machiavelli]

Lol! I think some are confusing Everton with Trotters Independent Traders.

I think even Del and Rodders would have too much about them to deal with some on here.

 

[Neville Kneville]

I think the hype is silly as well and I agree on Lescott, if we don't sign Stones I'm sure folk will backtrack à la Pogba.

I think we'll get him or already have pretty much.

 

[pml79]

Perhaps City wanted him to play?

Risky so close to season for the amount of money too

 

[unlikelyfan19]

Perhaps City wanted him to play?

That's what I am thinking. We may have specifically requested that he get some field time so that he is a little closer to being ready to go when he gets here.

 

[Neville Kneville]

Risky so close to season for the amount of money too

It was only Utd.

 

[Machiavelli]

I think we'll get him or already have pretty much.

Me too, I can see the headline

The Philosopher's Stones