But neither wanted to pay over the oddsIf Pep wants Stones, happy days. I'm not sure why, but for some reason I trust his judgement. He must have been successful in previous jobs. Mourinho wanted him too... I'd say he's doing pretty well for himself to an extent too.
The Crankies could have won the league with what Pellers inherited... Pep is a planner thankfully and we no longer have to resort to the chicken bones any more to determine tactics...No I haven't,I'm interested in what happens on the pitch to be honest,Pelligrini didn't do a book,but won the league,I'm hoping the same happens here
The Crankies could have won the league with what Pellers inherited... Pep is a planner thankfully and we no longer have to resort to the chicken bones any more to determine tactics...
for good reason... he was tactically inept....Sad thing is that many believe that tosh
Is this our last £50m, has the oil finally ran out like it was foretold?
for good reason... he was tactically inept....
And I am so grateful that we have him,I really am,but this thread is about the potential signing of John Stones for 50m,which I just do not get,on the evidence of what I have seen,opinion,and opinion only
£50 mill is a lot of money but at the same time we are seeing a window in which Troy deaney is above £30 mill. The simple fact is we are buying young English potential and in reality Utd paid £30 million for Rio back in 2002 so 45-50 now I'm not to fussed about because my opinion is John Stones is perfect for Pep and Manchester city and will become one of the very best in world football.