John Terry [Merged]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: More info on JT

Blue bob said:
blupoo said:
Uwe Rosler's Grandad said:
I believe that there is a real possibility of signing John Terry.
mentioned the other day (Can't remember which thread ) that there were issues with Kaka due to sponsorship (Adidas) rights. Seems strange that we sign a ten year deal with Umbro and the next thing we put in a bid for Terry - who is England captain (Umbro kit) and is also sponsored by umbro. The team sponsors would obviously want their main man playing in their kit week in week out.As I said the other week on BM (Which by coincidence appeared in MEN last week - don't know how that happened?) There has got to be legs in this new sponsor/Terry situation.


Adidas own Umbro. i don't think there would be an issue it Terry playing in an Umbro kit.

I thought Nike owned Umbro
 
Re: John Terry- Never going to happen!

was just on the chelsea forum and they r talking about spursmad saying how can you trust him hes a spuds fan but then they found out about the decent info and theres alot of conspiracy theories going on good to see em shitting it a bit who would have thought it......loving it even if we dont get him
 
Re: More info on JT

waterfootblues said:
Blue bob said:
blupoo said:
Uwe Rosler's Grandad said:
I believe that there is a real possibility of signing John Terry.
mentioned the other day (Can't remember which thread ) that there were issues with Kaka due to sponsorship (Adidas) rights. Seems strange that we sign a ten year deal with Umbro and the next thing we put in a bid for Terry - who is England captain (Umbro kit) and is also sponsored by umbro. The team sponsors would obviously want their main man playing in their kit week in week out.As I said the other week on BM (Which by coincidence appeared in MEN last week - don't know how that happened?) There has got to be legs in this new sponsor/Terry situation.


Adidas own Umbro. i don't think there would be an issue it Terry playing in an Umbro kit.

I thought Nike owned Umbro
1dart said:
Blue bob said:
blupoo said:
Uwe Rosler's Grandad said:
I believe that there is a real possibility of signing John Terry.
mentioned the other day (Can't remember which thread ) that there were issues with Kaka due to sponsorship (Adidas) rights. Seems strange that we sign a ten year deal with Umbro and the next thing we put in a bid for Terry - who is England captain (Umbro kit) and is also sponsored by umbro. The team sponsors would obviously want their main man playing in their kit week in week out.As I said the other week on BM (Which by coincidence appeared in MEN last week - don't know how that happened?) There has got to be legs in this new sponsor/Terry situation.


Adidas own Umbro. i don't think there would be an issue it Terry playing in an Umbro kit.

I thought nike owned umbro?
Robinho's Subbuteo said:
Blue bob said:
blupoo said:
Uwe Rosler's Grandad said:
I believe that there is a real possibility of signing John Terry.
mentioned the other day (Can't remember which thread ) that there were issues with Kaka due to sponsorship (Adidas) rights. Seems strange that we sign a ten year deal with Umbro and the next thing we put in a bid for Terry - who is England captain (Umbro kit) and is also sponsored by umbro. The team sponsors would obviously want their main man playing in their kit week in week out.As I said the other week on BM (Which by coincidence appeared in MEN last week - don't know how that happened?) There has got to be legs in this new sponsor/Terry situation.


Adidas own Umbro. i don't think there would be an issue it Terry playing in an Umbro kit.

I thought Nike owned Umbro.

all together now
 
Re: More info on JT

I think when people talk about John Terry being hated by everyone in the game if this happens, they are a bit wide of the mark. Obviously Chelsea fans will not forget but being as he is England captain everyone else will be forced to get behind him in the world cup, by which time they will have had a season to get used to him playing for City - from everyone except Chelsea fans the stick he gets will be relatively short-lived.
 
Re: John Terry- Never going to happen!

bugsyblue said:
Bojinov The Bull said:
Honestly, Terry is a very REAL possibility! I heard some information the other day and nothing has changed since, we are still on the brink of getting him!

As for the people on this forum....

You get 2 types i've noticed, your first type is the excitable, lets the good times roll type who get carried away with any bit of news (I prefer this type!). Then you have your cynical, seen it all before, i wont believe it until it happens, theres no way he would come to our club type, these people deep down do believe its going to happen but because its unlikely they say it won't to save face so they can boast how smart they are afterwards if it doesnt come off! Of course if it does come off then nobody would care or remember what they were saying before!

Mate you're right in many ways but honestly I get very excited and am excited about the possibility of JT but my head is telling me it aint going to happen. It wasn't suppose to be a negative post, and like the old saying goes, you have to be in it to win it, and I love the fact that City are bidding for the best players in the world. But in this instance, I just can't see us pulling it off.

In a week's time I'll probably be on here with my tail between my legs as JT is at his city press conference. And if that is the case I'll be the first to admit I'm wrong and I'll be laughing my arse off as we sign one of the best defenders in the wolrd!


Fair enough mate!
 
Re: More info on JT

waterfootblues said:
Blue bob said:
blupoo said:
Uwe Rosler's Grandad said:
I believe that there is a real possibility of signing John Terry.
mentioned the other day (Can't remember which thread ) that there were issues with Kaka due to sponsorship (Adidas) rights. Seems strange that we sign a ten year deal with Umbro and the next thing we put in a bid for Terry - who is England captain (Umbro kit) and is also sponsored by umbro. The team sponsors would obviously want their main man playing in their kit week in week out.As I said the other week on BM (Which by coincidence appeared in MEN last week - don't know how that happened?) There has got to be legs in this new sponsor/Terry situation.


Adidas own Umbro. i don't think there would be an issue it Terry playing in an Umbro kit.

I thought Nike owned Umbro
NO.....I thought Nike owned Umbro?
 
Re: More info on JT

waterfootblues said:
Blue bob said:
blupoo said:
Uwe Rosler's Grandad said:
I believe that there is a real possibility of signing John Terry.
mentioned the other day (Can't remember which thread ) that there were issues with Kaka due to sponsorship (Adidas) rights. Seems strange that we sign a ten year deal with Umbro and the next thing we put in a bid for Terry - who is England captain (Umbro kit) and is also sponsored by umbro. The team sponsors would obviously want their main man playing in their kit week in week out.As I said the other week on BM (Which by coincidence appeared in MEN last week - don't know how that happened?) There has got to be legs in this new sponsor/Terry situation.


Adidas own Umbro. i don't think there would be an issue it Terry playing in an Umbro kit.

I thought Nike owned Umbro

either way it doesnt matter, the transfer request is going in on friday, along with tevez being announced.

good times...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.