John Terry [Merged]

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't care if they report us for tapping up. I don't care whether Hughes has broken any rules by talking about him. I don't care if we actually tapped him up. In fact, I hope we have.

It's not going to make any difference to us is it? Or to them if we get a fine. Don't see the point myself.

Is this actually being said? Surely they wouldn't be doing this if he had agreed to stay?

We must be really getting on their tits. Good :-)

Sounds like we turned his head with the money, they turned it with an improved offer, and we may have turned it again by offering more still (hence the reigniting of the 'tapping up' row?).

He's like a fucking owl that lad, his head seems to turn all the way round...
 
if the odds are anything to go by it looks like we have fook all chance!

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.oddschecker.com/football/football-specials/john-terry-specials/to-stay" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.oddschecker.com/football/foo ... ls/to-stay</a>
 
If this is still goin on by the weekend, it will serve as yet another wind up for the Chelski chavs. A lot of them were pretty confident after this morning's papers that Terry was intending to issue a press statement confirming his decision to stay. They're expecting to hear something any minute now and the longer they wait, the more agitated they'll get. The unholy chav trinity of RA, MK and Anchelotti are not exactly helping matters. I think they are well over stating their alleged certainties on re Mr Chelski's intentions. Kenyon in particular has form for this sort of thing. I still recall his idiotic remarks during the Robbie negotiations. Here is what happened with that.

About 48 hours before anyone knew anything about City's intended hijack of that deal and before The Pensioners FC or any one else knew a thing about the take over, Chelski gave a specific date that Robbie would be signing for them. It was supposed to be on a friday but Friday passed without him making an appearance and by Saturday morning, people were saying there must have been a snag. In fact as far as anyone knew, the player hadn't even flown in. On the Saturday, the media asked the twatzoid Kenyon to explain why Robbie hadn't signed and why hadn't flown into the UK as expected. Kenyon said that Robbie had flown in but wanted to do some shopping in London over the weekend and would conclude the deal early the following week. He also said he'd met up with the player when he first arrived I think he may have expected to get away with this lie because as far as he was concerned, no other club would be coming in for Robbie and there'd be nobody to contradict him when Robbie eventually did sign for Chelski (other than Robbie himself). It was all a bit odd. Anyway, two days later, Hughes met Robbie at the air port and so Kenyon's deranged lying about meeting the player and showing him round London were exposed as total bullshit. This is the sort of knob-head factor that make Chelski so difficult to negotiate with.
 
OK, I'll ask again: Pam what is your problem with Chelsea? What's with constant negativity towards CFC? You seem obsessed with it.
 
Look John, it's been ni-on 3 weeks now since the first bid and you still haven't spoken, nevermind made a choice. Do us all a favour, end this saga onCe and for all. it's getting rather tedious now. Your not Barack Obama FFS!
 
jrb said:
Look John, it's been ni-on 3 weeks now since the first bid and you still haven't spoken, nevermind made a choice. Do us all a favour, end this saga onCe and for all. it's getting rather tedious now. Your not Barack Obama FFS!
Click to expand...


PMSL
 
CTID_92 said:
let them try reporting us. Its just goes to show we're getting at them. Hughes has simply answered questions he has been asked by the media and has said little more than, he admires Terry but while he is a Chelsea play he can say little more. If they are reporting us for privately tapping up then JT should face a club fine for talking to us without his club's permission.
Click to expand...

'kin 'ell if Hughes taps up what does twitcher do? Not only does he tap the players up he conducts the price negotiations via the frigging media, him and baconface get away with it time and again
 
Let me get this right Bob. You come on a City forum and moan that a staunch City fan shows a dislike for another team? Football is tribal, and irration dislike of other teams is commonplace. I'm not saying Pam has a problem with Chelsea but why would that be abnormal?

I hate Leeds. Behind Man Yoo they are the antithesis of everything I dislike about football. It is totally irrational but that is what football can instill in people. Or have you Chelsea boys become such paragons of virtue since loosing the richest club title that this doesn't happen to you?

Remember your clubs role in Ashley Coles transfer? Remember how Mourinho calculatingly targetted officials he perceived could not be influenced so they didn't get Chelsea matches? There are many reasons why some people don't like various clubs.
 
Look at it from JT's point of view.......

He's done tap all.

The Chief Exec, the manager & the entire squad are falling over themselves to talk about him. The owner has reportedly agreed a huge (£1m a yr, (£20k per Week) hike in his salary.

And all for Jt keeping quiet.

If my boss would give me that for keeping quiet, I'd become a Trappist monk!
 
Farmer Blue said:
Let me get this right Bob. You come on a City forum and moan that a staunch City fan shows a dislike for another team? Football is tribal, and irration dislike of other teams is commonplace. I'm not saying Pam has a problem with Chelsea but why would that be abnormal?

I hate Leeds. Behind Man Yoo they are the antithesis of everything I dislike about football. It is totally irrational but that is what football can instill in people. Or have you Chelsea boys become such paragons of virtue since loosing the richest club title that this doesn't happen to you?

Remember your clubs role in Ashley Coles transfer? Remember how Mourinho calculatingly targetted officials he perceived could not be influenced so they didn't get Chelsea matches? There are many reasons why some people don't like various clubs.
Click to expand...

Or the way their players behaved when they lost to Barca...Or the time they caused one of the worlds top refs to retire as he received death threats....
 
Timbobs said:
bobrivers said:
OK, I'll ask again: Pam what is your problem with Chelsea? What's with constant negativity towards CFC? You seem obsessed with it.
Click to expand...

Yea, I hear she's going to join a Chelsea forum.

Irony.
Click to expand...

I don't like Chelsea because Chelsea aren't City. And because you are all twatzoids.
 
The Fixer said:
uwerosler28 said:
The extra 1k would not be about the money but guaranteeing he is the highest paid player at the club i guess there are players on 150k already its a bit like the contract roy keane had at united
Click to expand...

Very clever move by chelsea, lamps has a clause in his contract which states he has to be paid parity with top earners, so he only gets a 1k rise.
Click to expand...

But that doesn't matter because all they need do is what Terry is alleged to be doing.
 
In a funny kind of way i challenge chelski to report us to the fa!

1) imo they would fail to provide concrete evidence and facts to back up their theory of tapping up! rumour and hearsay it is at best.

2) I personally would see this as a positive for us, this could possibly be JT is not commiting to chelski and they feel they are losing him!

The latest media reports claiming chelsea officialls have "unofficially" briefed the media/papers could just be chelsea putting as much pressure on JT to stay.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top