Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
I wonder if this is an SWP situation in reverse? When SWP went to Chelsea, City were in the shit financially and couldn't afford to turn £21m down. However, they also didn't want to look like the bad guys as that could have rebounded on them quite badly. So they came up with the story that SWP had requested to talk to Chelsea even though it was complete bollocks. He didn't want to go but was told by Wardle that is was necessary for the club's survival and that we had no choice.
So is this all about how they actually do the deal and manage the media, rather than about whether the deal is done at all?
So is this all about how they actually do the deal and manage the media, rather than about whether the deal is done at all?