John Terry [Merged]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bellamy's Caddy said:
chorleybloo123 said:
Try and find it.

I wouldn't be suprised if it goes back up later, I'm sure I've had that before on newspaper sites where an article is there for a while, goes away then pops back up. I hope it doesn't come back though!

Nothing in the article... A Chelsea 'source' said he is staying blah blah.
 
BLUEMOONBAZ said:
lets get the 40 m bid in before (the terry reveals all) press conference
and then see what happens

Are they promising a press conference are just a statement from the player? And is it a joint thing with Chelski or is he planning remarks as an individual? If he was staying, why wouldn't he just announce it now and kill the speculation? What's so special about the end of the week that he has to wait for it before saying anything? And don't say it's because he's been offered a huge new deal with the snivelling Kenyonites because they just aren't up to that these days.

NB The Torygraph article reads like complete and utter guesswork. They may be right or wrong in saying a statement is due but what makes them think they know what he's going to say? Are other papers running this?. Can't find any except for the latest Anchelotti bullshitisms.
 
Pam said:
BLUEMOONBAZ said:
lets get the 40 m bid in before (the terry reveals all) press conference
and then see what happens

Are they promising a press conference are just a statement from the player? And is it a joint thing with Chelski or is he planning remarks as an individual? If he was staying, why wouldn't he just announce it now and kill the speculation? What's so special about the end of the week that he has to wait for it before saying anything?

NB The Torygraph article reads like complete and utter guesswork. They may be right or wrong in saying a statement is due but what makes them think they know what he's going to say? Are other papers running thi?. Can't find any except for the latest Anchelotti bullshitisms.

That article has been removed pam.
 
Dr Bolouswki said:
If you're interested in the translation...

bobrivers said:
Дорогой дядя Петя, никогда не следует заранее утверждать, что вы знаете что-либо лучше чем ваш оппонент, если вы не имеете понятия с кем вы говорите и какова степень осведомленности вашего собеседника в обсуждаемом предмете.

То, что вы проживаете в России и знаете больше о Романе Аркадьевиче чем большинство рядовых посетителей этого форума не делает вас экспертом в моих глазах, поскольку я не только прожил долгую часть жизни в Росии, но и позже проработал несколько лет в компании представлявшей в том числе интересы Абрамовича в США (где я продолжаю жить и работать в данный момент).

Всего хорошего.


Dear Uncle Peter, you should never argue in advance that you know something better than your opponent, if you do not have a notion of what you say and what degree of awareness of your interlocutor in the subject under discussion.

The fact that you live in Russia and know more about Roman Arkadievich than most ordinary visitors of this forum does not make you an expert in my eyes, because I not only lived a long part of life in Russia, and later worked for several years, representing companies including Abramovich interests in the U.S. (where I continue to live and work at the moment).

Have a good time.
In that case how come old rivers here, based in the US, is such an ITK regarding the transfer???
 
The guy who wrote the Telegraph article, Jason Burt, is a known bullshitter.

That said I have no idea what to believe.
 
The Fixer said:
Pam said:
Are they promising a press conference are just a statement from the player? And is it a joint thing with Chelski or is he planning remarks as an individual? If he was staying, why wouldn't he just announce it now and kill the speculation? What's so special about the end of the week that he has to wait for it before saying anything?

NB The Torygraph article reads like complete and utter guesswork. They may be right or wrong in saying a statement is due but what makes them think they know what he's going to say? Are other papers running thi?. Can't find any except for the latest Anchelotti bullshitisms.

That article has been removed pam.

Thanks, Fixer.
 
The Fixer said:
I'm sure 1 or 2 posters on here work for the papers or at least have links to them, perhaps they can shed some light as to why articles like this get pulled?
Only two reasons I can think of...

Either a) new information comes to light which leads them to doubt the original story (ie. a source tells them it's inaccurate) or b) technical problems on the website.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.