Jude Bellingham

Outside of his footballing ability, what do you think of him?

Bit cocky and arrogant on the pitch, I don't mind that to much as long as he plays well also. I actually think England need a bit of that especially against the 'big' countries when we play them - feel we have been to soft over the decades at times.

Every interview I've seen him do comes across respectful and he speaks well.
 
Bringing racism into this is ridiculous. People who rightly fight racism can't agree what racism is.
Take Bernie and his cartoon character of mendy. Compare to ganancho posting mojo of a silver back gorilla to Onana. To me one was harmless fun, the other using a gorilla was not.

The problem with playing the racism card to often is it makes the problem of racism worst. Also as with Bernie and ganancho both being treated differently when both should have the same. Even people who fight racism can't decide what is or isn't.
For me Garnacho incident was worse then Bernie, using a gorilla to represent a black man is just so wrong. But Garnacho wasn't punished. This is way i find racism confusing.
I saw Bernie as a joke no worse then posting a picture of Tin Tin as KDB, I didnt see it as racism. But using a silver back gorilla towards a black keeper is ok.

I emailed 'kick out racism' for their view, didnt reply.

As for bellend for me its not about racism, that never entered my mind. It's because I have never seen him play well, his 'look at me' when he scores is all about him not the team. To me he is vasty over rated as a footballer and comes across as a twat who thinks he is brilliant.
I personally blame him, taa and southgate for Foden being poor last season. Phil went into that camp as player of the year, came back a shell of the player he is.
That’s a brilliant post, Gordon, I completely agree with everything you said in it.

On the Garnacho point, re: the gorilla and Onana. Danny Baker was sack by the BBC for portraying the Harry and Meghan's first child as a chimpanzee. He claimed that he didn’t even consider the consequences. I believe that, whereas Garnacho knew exactly what he was doing.

Bernie and Benjamin were very close friends, and had used that emoji several times over the years.

It’s as you say, those fighting racism don’t know what they’re doing, or racism is too complicated an issue.
 
I find parallels in the Bellingham discussion with those re Jofra Archer. The media would have us believe that both of them are the final pieces in us having winning teams as they are generational talents. However fans do not buy into the hype but judge them on their actual performances when playing for England. Most fans today have seen enough football or cricket to know when a player is a special talent. Fans as such have no vested interests in the way that the media have. Some fans do let club loyalties role over in football but they are in a minority and in cricket it's a non-existent issue.
So as I see it player criticism is not based on race but on a rebellious spirit which lets the media know we will not be hoodwinked into believing a player is a generational talent but we will judge him on performance and the respect he shows to his fellow professionals and the officials on the pitch
 
I find parallels in the Bellingham discussion with those re Jofra Archer. The media would have us believe that both of them are the final pieces in us having winning teams as they are generational talents. However fans do not buy into the hype but judge them on their actual performances when playing for England. Most fans today have seen enough football or cricket to know when a player is a special talent. Fans as such have no vested interests in the way that the media have. Some fans do let club loyalties role over in football but they are in a minority and in cricket it's a non-existent issue.
So as I see it player criticism is not based on race but on a rebellious spirit which lets the media know we will not be hoodwinked into believing a player is a generational talent but we will judge him on performance and the respect he shows to his fellow professionals and the officials on the pitch


To be fair that's a lot of words just to say he's a bit of a ****.
 
we will judge him on performance and the respect he shows to his fellow professionals and the officials on the pitch
Which he has consistently failed to do, hence the reason the average football fan has such a negative opinion of him. Why Wright had to bring racism into it I'll never know, because that has nothing to do with it. Bellend would be a **** regardless of his colour, so Wright's comments were ill-advised at best.
Football fans want to see their team do well on the pitch: race, religion, political and sexual persuasion etc, all of these things are irrelevant as long as the player puts in 100% for the club (or in this case country) and works within the structure of the team itself - ie, passes to a teammate now and again, particularly if that teammate is in a better position to score himself.
 
I find parallels in the Bellingham discussion with those re Jofra Archer. The media would have us believe that both of them are the final pieces in us having winning teams as they are generational talents. However fans do not buy into the hype but judge them on their actual performances when playing for England. Most fans today have seen enough football or cricket to know when a player is a special talent. Fans as such have no vested interests in the way that the media have. Some fans do let club loyalties role over in football but they are in a minority and in cricket it's a non-existent issue.
So as I see it player criticism is not based on race but on a rebellious spirit which lets the media know we will not be hoodwinked into believing a player is a generational talent but we will judge him on performance and the respect he shows to his fellow professionals and the officials on the pitch

The press are certainly obsessed with valuing individuals more than the team.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top