Numptyed
Well-Known Member
Re: Kaka - A theory.
Oh great, how am I to get any work done today now!Ajay said:
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Kaka [Merged]
- Thread starter markbmcfc
- Start date
Citizen Green
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 8 Apr 2009
- Messages
- 7,256
Re: Kaka - A theory.
Ajay do you think Tevez could sign today mate? :-)Ajay said:quick ajay. run for the hills. your in for it now
I am in Saudi Arabia today so intend to hide in the desert :)
Vitek
Well-Known Member
Re: Kaka - A theory.
Kaka said himself he joing madrid and is very happy...and we dont have any chance of geting him...plus we dont need him we got Stevie Ireland who will be better than Kaka..
Kaka said himself he joing madrid and is very happy...and we dont have any chance of geting him...plus we dont need him we got Stevie Ireland who will be better than Kaka..
Re: Kaka - A theory.
Whilst I'm sure we would chuck our huge hat into the ring again, it doesn't make any sense for the deal to be "very similar" to last time.
Once a fee is agreed by AC, they become pretty much ambivalent as to where the player goes. Indeed, given the Champions League factor, I believe that they would PREFER him to go to City. Therefore why would City bid c.£35m higher than the next bidder? This isn't a sealed bid auction. An asking price has been set and can now be met by a number of parties. Perhaps, Kaka's personal deal could be sweetened even further from the one that we would have proposed in January but I simply don't believe that we would pay £91m for a player that may go elsewhere for £56m.
Remember this isnt a case like Ronaldinho where we agreed a higher price with Barca but AC said we will only pay a much lower amount and the player said, effectively, "its irrelevant what City will pay, I'm not going." In that case Barca had no choice but to accept the lower amount.
Ajay said:It is very similar.
Whilst I'm sure we would chuck our huge hat into the ring again, it doesn't make any sense for the deal to be "very similar" to last time.
Once a fee is agreed by AC, they become pretty much ambivalent as to where the player goes. Indeed, given the Champions League factor, I believe that they would PREFER him to go to City. Therefore why would City bid c.£35m higher than the next bidder? This isn't a sealed bid auction. An asking price has been set and can now be met by a number of parties. Perhaps, Kaka's personal deal could be sweetened even further from the one that we would have proposed in January but I simply don't believe that we would pay £91m for a player that may go elsewhere for £56m.
Remember this isnt a case like Ronaldinho where we agreed a higher price with Barca but AC said we will only pay a much lower amount and the player said, effectively, "its irrelevant what City will pay, I'm not going." In that case Barca had no choice but to accept the lower amount.
Tez Tosterone
Well-Known Member
Re: Kaka - A theory.
http://www.channel4.com/sport/football_ ... un04a.html
Things should come to head in the next three to foyr days, but not till then.
Meanwhile I still believe that We are somehow involved in this one.
http://www.channel4.com/sport/football_ ... un04a.html
Things should come to head in the next three to foyr days, but not till then.
Meanwhile I still believe that We are somehow involved in this one.
Re: Kaka - A theory.
you could use the David Villa arguement here
Kaka leave AC as AC need the money ..... he sign's for us an AC get the best return and he helps out the club he loves
Not the strongest arguement ....... If we have bid for him let hope Robbie is talking the talk in Brazil
projectriver said:Ajay said:It is very similar.
Whilst I'm sure we would chuck our huge hat into the ring again, it doesn't make any sense for the deal to be "very similar" to last time.
Once a fee is agreed by AC, they become pretty much ambivalent as to where the player goes. Indeed, given the Champions League factor, I believe that they would PREFER him to go to City. Therefore why would City bid c.£35m higher than the next bidder? This isn't a sealed bid auction. An asking price has been set and can now be met by a number of parties. Perhaps, Kaka's personal deal could be sweetened even further from the one that we would have proposed in January but I simply don't believe that we would pay £91m for a player that may go elsewhere for £56m.
Remember this isnt a case like Ronaldinho where we agreed a higher price with Barca but AC said we will only pay a much lower amount and the player said, effectively, "its irrelevant what City will pay, I'm not going." In that case Barca had no choice but to accept the lower amount.
you could use the David Villa arguement here
Kaka leave AC as AC need the money ..... he sign's for us an AC get the best return and he helps out the club he loves
Not the strongest arguement ....... If we have bid for him let hope Robbie is talking the talk in Brazil
Re: Kaka - A theory.
Lmao. "The silence is deafening"! That's because we aren't bidding for him, end of story. He doesn't want to come here and he doesn't care about the cash or Milan. He wants to play for Madrid but not look like the bad guy to Milan fans for leaving.
Please . . . LET. IT. GO.
Lmao. "The silence is deafening"! That's because we aren't bidding for him, end of story. He doesn't want to come here and he doesn't care about the cash or Milan. He wants to play for Madrid but not look like the bad guy to Milan fans for leaving.
Please . . . LET. IT. GO.
southstand117
Well-Known Member
Re: Kaka - A theory.
Wha do you mean by "put the boot in"..
Ajay said:I hate to say this and have put my bullet proof vest on, we have re-entered the battle - I did say to someone only yesterday that we have not put our hand in but we have put the boot in!
We have made a strong offer every aspect of the deal from transfer fee, personal terms and image rights....
Now it gets exciting!!!
Personally I believe we can spend the money better elsewhere, but that is just my opinion.
Wha do you mean by "put the boot in"..