HalfwayUpTheKippax
Well-Known Member
Better than our current defence, which is LACKOr KLAK for short.
Better than our current defence, which is LACKOr KLAK for short.
Im not having a go but I dont see the hype Van Dick seems to be lauded with on here.
Yes, he has improved the scousers, but is he really as good as you are making out, not in my eyes
I’d prefer Kounde anyway.hope we sack this guy off and go for kounde
No it applies to footballers whose prime force is their athelticism. When Richards knee became a problem, training around it was no use for him. His physicality was his game.So on the chance that KK's knee may 'go' we shouldn't buy him? Wouldn't that apply to every signing?
Depends on your merits for rating a centre half. Way different in modern game than it was even 10 years ago. He fits all the needs of one on current merits, is great with the ball (both feet), is a huge physical presence and wins aerials easily, and can defend largely well. Hence he's at the top of the list.Im not having a go but I dont see the hype Van Dick seems to be lauded with on here.
Yes, he has improved the scousers, but is he really as good as you are making out, not in my eyes
City prepare for 3 targets.City will have / should have prepared more than one target. Kounde sounds like its progressed a long way.
Better than our current defence, which is LACK