Kamala Harris

mancity1 said:
No just that she is the first female VP of the US.

There have been many number 2's world wide that have made a contribution and will in the future.

Harris I know will go down as a dud even though you think the role is nothing more than window dressing.

Ask Biden why he picked her after she played the race card once to often to answer it was only robust debate (LOL).

A bimbo in the extreme Fog sorry but that's just how it is.

She doesn't know how to play the game either.
Click to expand...

He 'picked' her because the Clinton chose her in the Hamptons. He wanted Klobuchar, but she got embroiled in the George Floyd nonsense early on.

He said he'd pick a Black female VP for the votes, then aimed at Amy Klo and got given Kam Har. Looks like Pete Buttigieg might even be shuttled forward to take over that role.

The Dems ticking all the boxes for the vote except doing the simple act of rising wages!
 
mancity1 said:
No just that she is the first female VP of the US.

There have been many number 2's world wide that have made a contribution and will in the future.

Harris I know will go down as a dud even though you think the role is nothing more than window dressing.

Ask Biden why he picked her after she played the race card once to often to answer it was only robust debate (LOL).

A bimbo in the extreme Fog sorry but that's just how it is.

She doesn't know how to play the game either.
Click to expand...
You’re kind of proving my point about one of the reasons she’s disliked by tagging her with a derogatory sexist term based on literally no information about her.

She’s the Vice President. I’ve tried to be helpful here in explaining why they’re picked and how they are thought of in America, where I live. We can revisit again when/if she’s a Presidential nominee.
 
Bigga said:
Go on then.

Tell the board what part is untrue.

I'll bet you go missing.
Click to expand...
To be fair she did say she was in distress for a large part of the day and would only be flashing in and out to make sure that the mancity1 and Bigga's of the world nonsense line was towed out again but even that she could not do (LOL) this time.

When she recovers she will join the MOB once again asked to explain herself once again spout some more words like rubbish and nonsense and maybe something more crass that has nothing to do with the subject matter and nothing more than dare I say a dislike for the poster or at best without attempting to explain a differing point to view and why she holds this view because in short she is incapable of doing so and it exposes her real agenda for posting in the first place and go missing once again like she always has until she feels like repeating it for the umpteenth time when she trolls once again.

the MOB with a couple of exceptions have a habit of never finishing what they start and do what the likes of Queensland Premier does all the time when her lies or lack of explanation to support the narrative and politically divisive narrative is exposed for what it is even by a complicit media and say whoops got to go and catch a CO2 chuggling plane to my next piece of BS.

She hasn't given one iota of detail as to why anybody would have confidence in the likes of Harris to improve the lot of the minority with constructive policy amendment and implementation in the US given her record and explain her governments policy on law and order for example going forward , why for example looting should remain a misdemeanour and not a felony in California for example.

Law and Order is and will will become even a bigger issue going forward in the US.
 
Bigga said:
The usual counter argument, but I guess the question is was Pence being groomed to take over or was he just a ventriloquist's dummy?
Click to expand...
Spot on , what Pence's approval rating has to with KH's is beyond me anyway its not even a counter argument.

Its the hear and now that matters , like saying the captain of the English cricket team is far more popular amongst his colleagues and the public or not so as the case may but it means nothing if the team is hopeless against any opposition.

China , USSR and North Korea know the US are weak at the top.

Joes climate envoy consisting of John Kerry says it means nought if they do nothing about reducing their emissions the US could go to zero and cripple manufacturing and their ability to be self sufficient in energy supply and it wouldn't matter.

No show for the big players at COP26 not that it would have mattered if they did and all is well until COP27 (lol).

You couldn't make it up.
 
FogBlueInSanFran said:
You’re kind of proving my point about one of the reasons she’s disliked by tagging her with a derogatory sexist term based on literally no information about her.

She’s the Vice President. I’ve tried to be helpful here in explaining why they’re picked and how they are thought of in America, where I live. We can revisit again when/if she’s a Presidential nominee.
Click to expand...
Apologies Fog lacking in cognitive skill and an ability to reason and as you say an ability to organise and hence achieve necessary reform taking the votes with her.

you can't laugh your way out of every question asked of you Fog , which is why she is hidden even from a complicit media.
 
mancity1 said:
Apologies Fog lacking in cognitive skill and an ability to reason and as you say an ability to organise and hence achieve necessary reform taking the votes with her.

you can't laugh your way out of every question asked of you Fog , which is why she is hidden even from a complicit media.
Click to expand...
What annoys me is that I try very hard to be balanced in my view of politics and people as best I can be; meantime we have the quite clearly stupid and dangerous Greene — with lower approval ratings from her own party than Harris has nationally, last I looked — angling to be Speaker of the House — a far more important role than VP — if the House flips in 22, and yet you have said nothing about that.

Why?

I like your music posts and I’m happy to disagree on politics but it seems you are being deliberately provocative here. Stop please.
 
FogBlueInSanFran said:
What annoys me is that I try very hard to be balanced in my view of politics and people as best I can be; meantime we have the quite clearly stupid and dangerous Greene — with lower approval ratings from her own party than Harris has nationally, last I looked — angling to be Speaker of the House — a far more important role than VP — if the House flips in 22, and yet you have said nothing about that.

Why?

I like your music posts and I’m happy to disagree on politics but it seems you are being deliberately provocative here. Stop please.
Click to expand...
I am not on here to please anybody Fog or kowtow to anybody even you and likewise as I often said I admire your knowledge in music and your ability to articulate this since you bring it up on a KH thread.

Your angle has been to compare democracy better served on the left or centre left to a cult.

its so simplistic to tow that line but you miss the boat so to speak with the greatest of respect to you and your balanced view as you term it.

I have formed an opinion about you in respect of your political views however that morphs and may well change the more posts I read from you should I decide to , however my posts are not aimed at obtaining a response from you nor ever directed at you nor are they aimed at you and you forming a opinion in this instance incorrectly as to any motive or desire unless you decide to reply or comment on them and I decide to respond in kind.

Deliberately provocative ? You read me incorrectly Fog and with respect to request someone to cease because you may disagree albeit in this instance you are introducing a hypothetical and should that occur it in all likelihood won't have the type of consequence you are suggesting.

Others on here have been cancelled because they post detail that others either take offence to , disagree with often without explaining why and when they attempt do , do little else than virtue signal and I think you are above that however time will tell.

they plead with the mob to rid such posters which is as discriminatory , absurd and stupid as one can get given there is an ignore feature and people can make up their own minds Fog on what they think or how they wish to respond and often these same posters engage in using vile , virtuous , non-sensical and provocative language often in breach of COC but unfortunately it is the only way they can express their opinion when they decide to attack and in the main the MODS to little other than appease their wish.

I speak for no-one other than myself and neither do you.

As I have told others many times if you don't like the view , you are free to explain why and perhaps you don't regard Harris as dangerous because her role is well down the pecking order in your eyes and in your view not as stupid in itself derogatory and sexist or can be construed as such as a comment you accuse someone else of delivering because of partisan views.

I would never request of you to cease your time posting on this thread despite your previous comments that you are growing tired of doing so and prefer to spend the time you have on other threads.

you have done it before Fog , you didn't learn much from the last time.

Food for thought Fog.
 
mancity1 said:
I am not on here to please anybody Fog or kowtow to anybody even you and likewise as I often said I admire your knowledge in music and your ability to articulate this since you bring it up on a KH thread.

Your angle has been to compare democracy better served on the left or centre left to a cult.

its so simplistic to tow that line but you miss the boat so to speak with the greatest of respect to you and your balanced view as you term it.

I have formed an opinion about you in respect of your political views however that morphs and may well change the more posts I read from you should I decide to , however my posts are not aimed at obtaining a response from you nor ever directed at you nor are they aimed at you and you forming a opinion in this instance incorrectly as to any motive or desire unless you decide to reply or comment on them and I decide to respond in kind.

Deliberately provocative ? You read me incorrectly Fog and with respect to request someone to cease because you may disagree albeit in this instance you are introducing a hypothetical and should that occur it in all likelihood won't have the type of consequence you are suggesting.

Others on here have been cancelled because they post detail that others either take offence to , disagree with often without explaining why and when they attempt do , do little else than virtue signal and I think you are above that however time will tell.

they plead with the mob to rid such posters which is as discriminatory , absurd and stupid as one can get given there is an ignore feature and people can make up their own minds Fog on what they think or how they wish to respond and often these same posters engage in using vile , virtuous , non-sensical and provocative language often in breach of COC but unfortunately it is the only way they can express their opinion when they decide to attack and in the main the MODS to little other than appease their wish.

I speak for no-one other than myself and neither do you.

As I have told others many times if you don't like the view , you are free to explain why and perhaps you don't regard Harris as dangerous because her role is well down the pecking order in your eyes and in your view not as stupid in itself derogatory and sexist or can be construed as such as a comment you accuse someone else of delivering because of partisan views.

I would never request of you to cease your time posting on this thread despite your previous comments that you are growing tired of doing so and prefer to spend the time you have on other threads.

you have done it before Fog , you didn't learn much from the last time.

Food for thought Fog.
Click to expand...
I quite enjoyed this :)
 
Bigga said:
I thought this was an interesting exercise in deflection. Busy blaming anyone other than a Democrat when asked a specific question...

Click to expand...

Funny to pick up on that rather than "You seem to get more criticism than any other VP, including Mike Pence"

I presume you mean her reluctance to blame Manchin for obstructing policies rather than the 50 Republicans.

It makes no sense though. "If Manchin can block all this, black people will not go out to vote and Trump will be president again."

Is that really really what you want? Why not turn out and get more Democrats elected and make Manchin a redundant pawn?
 
Vic said:
Funny to pick up on that rather than "You seem to get more criticism than any other VP, including Mike Pence"

I presume you mean her reluctance to blame Manchin for obstructing policies rather than the 50 Republicans.

It makes no sense though. "If Manchin can block all this, black people will not go out to vote and Trump will be president again."

Is that really really what you want? Why not turn out and get more Democrats elected and make Manchin a redundant pawn?
Click to expand...

Hm, if you listen to the interview, rather than the selected point about Manchin (I'll come back to that) you'll notice within the deflection there's the avoidance of knowing the Dems should have tackled the water crisis (in Flint and similar places) when Obama was in power and especially his 'water drinking' stunt which turned a lot of Black voters off his in that area.

'Chokeholds', they are addressing now? But not when the Eric Garners of this world were murdered on camera and Obama said and did nothing about it under his tenure.

Of course, then there's the raising of minimum wage and better healthcare (drug pricing), all off which would have helped box out any future Rep drive (Trump's win) and solidified Dem tenure for the future.

I note people asking about Manchin, what has stopped Biden going after him, when he has for intents and purposes, sank the 'Build Back Better' bill after getting what he wanted first. This was open knowledge of what would happen, so what are the excuses for ignoring the obvious?

Harris is, apparently, losing staff key to keeping her afloat, especially the outgoing Simone Sanders who was seen on cam being the blocker, at the end.

You would have to ask why.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top