Kaoru Mitoma

Cucurella cost over 60m.
Havertz cost 65m.
Rice cost 105m.

We also bid 80m plus 10m add ons for Rice.

80m for Mitoma isn't exactly unreasonable. He's a top quality footballer.

Controversially Mitoma is one of the lowest paid first team players in the Brighton squad, but he has held off from signing a 5 year extension contract. So, I don't believe we need to bid higher than 50~60m. Besides, we will obtain substantial commercial benefits with Mitoma as well.
 
Both are good players. The only difference is Paqueta seems the more versatile player and Mitoma might not be attainable this season.

Don't we need a winger to replace Mahrez though?

I don't think Paqueta can play on the wing.
 
Don't we need a winger to replace Mahrez though?

I don't think Paqueta can play on the wing.
We have several players who can play wide if needed. And Paqueta can cover that postion too (although not as effective as Mitoma). We can easily end up with neither but Paqueta is the more versatile player.
 
We have several players who can play wide if needed. And Paqueta can cover that postion too (although not as effective as Mitoma). We can easily end up with neither but Paqueta is the more versatile player.

We are talking about need for a proper "specialist" winger, not a player who can also play wide, though.

In the case of Mitoma, I believe he has played as a wingback, 10 and 8 as well. He plays more as a wide playmaker now.
 
Last edited:
We are talking about need for a proper "specialist" winger, not a player who can also play wide, though.
Although it is something different to the current attack it probably isn't required in Pep's new system.
 
Although it is something different to the current attack it probably isn't required in Pep's new system.

Pep's system needs a readjustment. It looks stale. I don't think we continue playing the way we've been playing and win matches against much strengthened teams this season. Our opponents now know how to play well against us. We need to evolve as well.
 
Controversially Mitoma is one of the lowest paid first team players in the Brighton squad, but he has held off from signing a 5 year extension contract. So, I don't believe we need to bid higher than 50~60m. Besides, we will obtain substantial commercial benefits with Mitoma as well.

There is no way Brighton are selling Mitoma for less than 60m.

Not a chance.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.