ElMago_DSilva
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Feb 2023
- Messages
- 556
- Team supported
- Man City
Whos to say ? Most people lol
Anyone credible? Ha.
Or just Rags saying it?
Whos to say ? Most people lol
What do you reckon then 61m
The club valued Cucurella, a 23 year old Barcelona academy player who had 4 years left on his contract, and a few years in europe, at 30m. For a position we really needed to fill, and supposedly a main target for the summer. That's a pretty good benchmark.
but Mitoma is another level than Cucurella, and we spent £100m on Jack Grealish in a position that wasn't desperately needed.The club valued Cucurella, a 23 year old Barcelona academy player who had 4 years left on his contract, and a few years in europe, at 30m. For a position we really needed to fill, and supposedly a main target for the summer. That's a pretty good benchmark.
To be fair they held out for around 60m from Chelsea and that is just for a full back.
Mitoma will go for more because he's a forward player.
but Mitoma is another level than Cucurella, and we spent £100m on Jack Grealish in a position that wasn't desperately needed.
Or he'll sign an extension shortly, protecting Brighton.He's gonna get his move next year and it won't be for a lot.. as he'll only have 1 year left on his contract next year.
View attachment 90685
I'm not saying he should/would £100m player but Cucurella is a "completely different profile and situation" from Mitoma as well, plus Cucurella ended up going for like £60m.Completely different signings. Completely different profile and situation.
I'm not saying he should/would £100m player but Cucurella is a "completely different profile and situation" from Mitoma as well, plus Cucurella ended up going for like £60m.