Keir Starmer

They didn't. Nothing in the remaining video is inconsistent or differs in context. At best he chose to be ambiguous.

He didn't address the siege and water point directly. He deliberately did that.
Look at the gmb link on the other page , they clipped him before he could say within international law

leaving you to it
 
Not sure why you have to be on the left to know it's wrong to be ambiguous on starving kids or treat a hardworking young mum like dirt when she's been campaigning in the consistency for 6 years.

I guess you don't have to be left wing just not as nasty as some of the posters on here, I mean who really tries to take the piss out of a group who are uncomfortable with starving kids.
 
Not sure why you have to be on the left to know it's wrong to be ambiguous on starving kids or treat a hardworking young mum like dirt when she's been campaigning in the consistency for 6 years.
It’s called politics. Wasn’t necessarily pointing to what you mention, more the Momentum few who have gone ballistic at the thought of any of the left being ousted.

Am I remembering right that Corbyn and Abbott did the same by ousting the right of the party?
 
It’s called politics. Wasn’t necessarily pointing to what you mention, more the Momentum few who have gone ballistic at the thought of any of the left being ousted.

Am I remembering right that Corbyn and Abbott did the same by ousting the right of the party?

Educate yourself.
 
It’s called politics. Wasn’t necessarily pointing to what you mention, more the Momentum few who have gone ballistic at the thought of any of the left being ousted.

Am I remembering right that Corbyn and Abbott did the same by ousting the right of the party?
no one was ousted, people who couldn't act like adults and show support for the broard church the party was flounced and left, but you won't be able to name any deselected or kicked out I bet.

Mandelsons lot and the progress think tank never could share a table with people maybe a little bit a socialist, where as socialist actively supported the party through kinnock, smith, blair even though they were not of the same idiologies, Starmer though is different, he has no unity or sense of loyalty to the many factions and beliefs Labour has held for a 100 years, if he thought you were not of use he would stab
you in the back
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.