Keir Starmer

Labour lost badly because of BREXIT, it failed to support it, when it should have done and that left the working class at odds with the party. It made Labour look the party of the liberal metro elite and the red wall fucked them off as a result.

Bingo! This man gets it.

I will however have to agree with @Ancient Citizen in so much the pat on the head approach of left wing labour telling us all how badly we have it and that the country has never been shitter just doesn't reflect the lives of the vast majority Russ I'm afraid and that is also a message that gets boring fast and very quickly ignored.

Even more so when its some metropolitan elite momentum/#FBPE on £100k a year in their £400k flat on the banks of the Thames!
 
Bingo! This man gets it.

I will however have to agree with @Ancient Citizen in so much the pat on the head approach of left wing labour telling us all how badly we have it and that the country has never been shitter just doesn't reflect the lives of the vast majority Russ I'm afraid and that is also a message that gets boring fast and very quickly ignored.

Even more so when its some metropolitan elite momentum/#FBPE on £100k a year in their £400k flat on the banks of the Thames!
The message wasn't life is shit, it was life could be better and it could. Nobody ever gets elected by saying life is shit.

There is a common term now used in nudge theory called Boosterism, Johnson uses it a lot, its the projection of confidence in something he isn't confident in. Labour could have learned from that and employed Boosterism but I believe its shallow and would rather be told how it is rather than how its perceived to be.
 
So the manifesto wasn't hard left, it was a throw away remark you read in the Daily Express.

Labour lost badly because of BREXIT, it failed to support it, when it should have done and that left the working class at odds with the party. It made Labour look the party of the liberal metro elite and the red wall fucked them off as a result.

Britain has got huge problems with poverty, parts of Manchester are amongst the poorest areas in Europe, we have more foodbanks than Mcdonalds, the austerity years were cruel on those with least, the minimum wage is a joke, the NHS is crumbling and lacks funding, the schools are a disgrace, UK students pay some of the highest fees in the world, we have massive problems with homelessness, their is a crisis in mental health services, zero hour jobs are a piss take, the manufacturing industry has been destroyed, the Banks have took the piss, the roads are full of potholes, the railways are third world, town centres are dying, yes some are doing well and good luck to them but many are not and those who are not doing well are doing even worse under this miserable fucking excuse for a Govt, but the very tradesman who are doing well complained about immigrants taking their jobs so who are they doing well?

Politics in this country is always about class, everything that is done is about class, Blair claimed we are all middle class now, the fucking clown pandering to the Thatcherite myth of a meritocracy, a meritocracy that does not exist because Capitalism does not allow for a meritocracy so the Capitalists use their influence to paint anything that threatens their hegemony as hard left because they hate parting with their money, they are only patriotic towards their bank balance and yachts in the Cayman Islands not to the country or its millions of hard working decent folk struggling to get by from day to day with no savings and relying on foodbanks to feed their kids.

And what we have now is a Labour party in thrall to the capitalists because they have backed Starmer and he is no threat to their hegemony because he needs their money to become PM.
I'm afraid the type of country you describe is not this one, and the people
you're convinced are doing very badly just voted for the Conservatives. Labour tried
the 'Huge poverty' tack and it didn't work, because, in the main, it isn't there, the working
class are no longer the thousands of proles grafting in mega factories, and the kind of
politics you want is now just a past memory, that won't be enacted.
I know you're a communist mate, you've admitted it many times, and fair enough,
to each their own, but you must realise that that philosophy was badly flawed at the time,
it resulted in untold misery, and will never, ever work.
 
Labour lost because of a) Brexit b) Corbyn as a candidate and c) their open alliance with identity politics.

The working class aren’t opposed to some left leaning policies and don’t mind nationalisation of industry, if it can be shown to work but they are patriotic and they can’t stand wokeism.

I think Starmer will get this, he’s too clever not to.
 
I'm afraid the type of country you describe is not this one, and the people
you're convinced are doing very badly just voted for the Conservatives. Labour tried
the 'Huge poverty' tack and it didn't work, because, in the main, it isn't there, the working
class are no longer the thousands of proles grafting in mega factories, and the kind of
politics you want is now just a past memory, that won't be enacted.
I know you're a communist mate, you've admitted it many times, and fair enough,
to each their own, but you must realise that that philosophy was badly flawed at the time,
it resulted in untold misery, and will never, ever work.

Are you comical Ali?

Everything I stated exists, you simply cannot deny that millions rely on foodbanks, are on zero hours contracts, the schools are crumbling, the NHS is underfunded and their is a mental health crisis etc etc. You must drive down roads full of potholes and if you ever try to use the train you must know its a bag shit. Can you tell me where I am wrong? Because I don't see this utopia you live in and I live in a decent area.

https://www.poverty.ac.uk/report-poverty-england/poverty-manchester-–-people-face-‘hunger-and-fear’

Read the above, thats Manchester at the moment.

Labour lost because it didnt support brexit, most of the red wall supported brexit, so voted for a party that promised to deliver it. Even the Tories acknowledge that votes were lent to them so brexit could be enacted. The real failure was Labour pandering to London and ignoring its traditional voters.

As for Starmer he has no answer's but Blairite contuism. He has no vision for radical change and if he had the vision he would back brexit rather than let the Tories own it. Rightly or wrongly the old labour supporters of the red wall see brexit as an opportunity to escape poverty, a renewal in the Britain they once knew.

We can argue all day long about it but imho austerity paved the way for brexit, the govt. managed to deflect blame for austerity onto the EU and it was an opportunity for them to enable brexit. As Alexei Sayle put it so succinctly the notion that too many libraries in Wolverhampton caused a worldwide Banking crisis is utter nonsense, but people see their libraries being shut, their services cut, their care cut and the blame was appropriated towards the EU and immigration through clever media manipulation and overt propoganda. I have long argued that the true patriotic party in the UK was the Labour party as it represented the patriotic working class and because of that it should have sold brexit as an opportunity to organise the economy along Socialist lines, but Starmer and the Labour PLPs insistence on being pro-EU not only betrayed Socialism it managed to lose the patriotic working class vote to the Tories. The Tories only show patriotism towards money and capitalism, that is the altar they worship at, but they were clever enough to know that Brexit would give them an opportunity to turn England Blue and enable an even more severe form of neo=liberalist economics. The swing to the right of politics in this country shows they were correct in their analysis and one of the reasons Corbyn was so demonised was because he was the antithesis of where the Tories hope to take us. Corbyn can be criticised for many things but at least he tried to pull politics back leftwards where as Starmer is quite comfortable on Tory lite/Blairite/centrist ground.

We could well end up in this country with a two party system similar to the USA with a party of the right and a party of the further right, like the democrats and republicans because i envisage a new party of the left, because Labour under Starmer has left the left and become a centrist party. He may be a decent fella i dont know, to me he comes across as a man who has no conviction or leftist principles and he is a man quite happy to purge the left and pander to capitalism.

One of lifes big mysteries to me, is why the working class continually vote gainst their own interests.
 
Labour lost because of a) Brexit b) Corbyn as a candidate and c) their open alliance with identity politics.

The working class aren’t opposed to some left leaning policies and don’t mind nationalisation of industry, if it can be shown to work but they are patriotic and they can’t stand wokeism.

I think Starmer will get this, he’s too clever not to.

D) most people are doing alright and vote out their own pocket, so would rather stick with the Tory’s
 
Are you comical Ali?

Everything I stated exists, you simply cannot deny that millions rely on foodbanks, are on zero hours contracts, the schools are crumbling, the NHS is underfunded and their is a mental health crisis etc etc. You must drive down roads full of potholes and if you ever try to use the train you must know its a bag shit. Can you tell me where I am wrong? Because I don't see this utopia you live in and I live in a decent area.

https://www.poverty.ac.uk/report-poverty-england/poverty-manchester-–-people-face-‘hunger-and-fear’

Read the above, thats Manchester at the moment.

Labour lost because it didnt support brexit, most of the red wall supported brexit, so voted for a party that promised to deliver it. Even the Tories acknowledge that votes were lent to them so brexit could be enacted. The real failure was Labour pandering to London and ignoring its traditional voters.

As for Starmer he has no answer's but Blairite contuism. He has no vision for radical change and if he had the vision he would back brexit rather than let the Tories own it. Rightly or wrongly the old labour supporters of the red wall see brexit as an opportunity to escape poverty, a renewal in the Britain they once knew.

We can argue all day long about it but imho austerity paved the way for brexit, the govt. managed to deflect blame for austerity onto the EU and it was an opportunity for them to enable brexit. As Alexei Sayle put it so succinctly the notion that too many libraries in Wolverhampton caused a worldwide Banking crisis is utter nonsense, but people see their libraries being shut, their services cut, their care cut and the blame was appropriated towards the EU and immigration through clever media manipulation and overt propoganda. I have long argued that the true patriotic party in the UK was the Labour party as it represented the patriotic working class and because of that it should have sold brexit as an opportunity to organise the economy along Socialist lines, but Starmer and the Labour PLPs insistence on being pro-EU not only betrayed Socialism it managed to lose the patriotic working class vote to the Tories. The Tories only show patriotism towards money and capitalism, that is the altar they worship at, but they were clever enough to know that Brexit would give them an opportunity to turn England Blue and enable an even more severe form of neo=liberalist economics. The swing to the right of politics in this country shows they were correct in their analysis and one of the reasons Corbyn was so demonised was because he was the antithesis of where the Tories hope to take us. Corbyn can be criticised for many things but at least he tried to pull politics back leftwards where as Starmer is quite comfortable on Tory lite/Blairite/centrist ground.

We could well end up in this country with a two party system similar to the USA with a party of the right and a party of the further right, like the democrats and republicans because i envisage a new party of the left, because Labour under Starmer has left the left and become a centrist party. He may be a decent fella i dont know, to me he comes across as a man who has no conviction or leftist principles and he is a man quite happy to purge the left and pander to capitalism.

One of lifes big mysteries to me, is why the working class continually vote gainst their own interests.
Worth also mentioning that Labour lost Scotland and the Tories have the ref on their side ( the media).
 
Bingo! This man gets it.

I will however have to agree with @Ancient Citizen in so much the pat on the head approach of left wing labour telling us all how badly we have it and that the country has never been shitter just doesn't reflect the lives of the vast majority Russ I'm afraid and that is also a message that gets boring fast and very quickly ignored.

Even more so when its some metropolitan elite momentum/#FBPE on £100k a year in their £400k flat on the banks of the Thames!
See you've bought the mobs and the snobs with the hated liberal elite in the middle thing mate.
You're going to feel mighty let down when you find out the snobs don't give a sh1t and are only in it for themselves.
Levelling up.
Do me a favour.
 
Are you comical Ali?

Everything I stated exists, you simply cannot deny that millions rely on foodbanks, are on zero hours contracts, the schools are crumbling, the NHS is underfunded and their is a mental health crisis etc etc. You must drive down roads full of potholes and if you ever try to use the train you must know its a bag shit. Can you tell me where I am wrong? Because I don't see this utopia you live in and I live in a decent area.

https://www.poverty.ac.uk/report-poverty-england/poverty-manchester-–-people-face-‘hunger-and-fear’

Read the above, thats Manchester at the moment.

Labour lost because it didnt support brexit, most of the red wall supported brexit, so voted for a party that promised to deliver it. Even the Tories acknowledge that votes were lent to them so brexit could be enacted. The real failure was Labour pandering to London and ignoring its traditional voters.

As for Starmer he has no answer's but Blairite contuism. He has no vision for radical change and if he had the vision he would back brexit rather than let the Tories own it. Rightly or wrongly the old labour supporters of the red wall see brexit as an opportunity to escape poverty, a renewal in the Britain they once knew.

We can argue all day long about it but imho austerity paved the way for brexit, the govt. managed to deflect blame for austerity onto the EU and it was an opportunity for them to enable brexit. As Alexei Sayle put it so succinctly the notion that too many libraries in Wolverhampton caused a worldwide Banking crisis is utter nonsense, but people see their libraries being shut, their services cut, their care cut and the blame was appropriated towards the EU and immigration through clever media manipulation and overt propoganda. I have long argued that the true patriotic party in the UK was the Labour party as it represented the patriotic working class and because of that it should have sold brexit as an opportunity to organise the economy along Socialist lines, but Starmer and the Labour PLPs insistence on being pro-EU not only betrayed Socialism it managed to lose the patriotic working class vote to the Tories. The Tories only show patriotism towards money and capitalism, that is the altar they worship at, but they were clever enough to know that Brexit would give them an opportunity to turn England Blue and enable an even more severe form of neo=liberalist economics. The swing to the right of politics in this country shows they were correct in their analysis and one of the reasons Corbyn was so demonised was because he was the antithesis of where the Tories hope to take us. Corbyn can be criticised for many things but at least he tried to pull politics back leftwards where as Starmer is quite comfortable on Tory lite/Blairite/centrist ground.

We could well end up in this country with a two party system similar to the USA with a party of the right and a party of the further right, like the democrats and republicans because i envisage a new party of the left, because Labour under Starmer has left the left and become a centrist party. He may be a decent fella i dont know, to me he comes across as a man who has no conviction or leftist principles and he is a man quite happy to purge the left and pander to capitalism.

One of lifes big mysteries to me, is why the working class continually vote gainst their own interests.
I'll agree with lots of that about austerity but if you think "Labour lost because it didnt support brexit" and that Corbyn wasn't at least as big a factor, then you didn't do much campaigning for Labour.
 
See you've bought the mobs and the snobs with the hated liberal elite in the middle thing mate.
You're going to feel mighty let down when you find out the snobs don't give a sh1t and are only in it for themselves.
Levelling up.
Do me a favour.

Bought nothing Len.

Hilarious that all you dyed in the wool socialists put all your money and faith in the metropolitan elite though as you abandoned the working class with your brexit snobbery and name calling.

Even funnier will be watching you all trying to win them back anytime soon.

Not happening!
 
Bought nothing Len.

Hilarious that all you dyed in the wool socialists put all your money and faith in the metropolitan elite though as you abandoned the working class with your brexit snobbery and name calling.

Even funnier will be watching you all trying to win them back anytime soon.

Not happening!
Baroness Fox, Lord Lebedev, Cummings, top of the covid death leagues etc etc.
It's happening as we speak mate.
Wake up and smell it.
 
Bought nothing Len.

Hilarious that all you dyed in the wool socialists put all your money and faith in the metropolitan elite though as you abandoned the working class with your brexit snobbery and name calling.

Even funnier will be watching you all trying to win them back anytime soon.

Not happening!
I do love the fact that you seem to consider this government as somehow not part of the Metropolitan elite, with the interest of the majority uppermost in their minds, but hey ho.
I must admit though, that last December I thought the bloke was in for 10 years, no problem.
But, as for Labour not winning them back anytime soon, I don’t think they’ll actually need to win them back as I think Boris will just let them go. Closing more libraries and sure start schemes, through council cutbacks whilst enabling HS2 (will trains ever be full again?), giving PPE contracts worth hundreds of millions out to venture capital companies whilst millions lose their jobs. Not delivering oven ready social care reforms, just for starters.
Wait until all those people who decry the ‘feckless unemployed scroungers’ have to claim UC themselves, then wait for 5 weeks to get anything, get treated like crap for claiming and have to then manage on the amount they get. All those talks of ‘benefit lifestyle’ will be put to bed at least, I suppose.
 
I'll agree with lots of that about austerity but if you think "Labour lost because it didnt support brexit" and that Corbyn wasn't at least as big a factor, then you didn't do much campaigning for Labour.

I did plenty mate, Corbyn was a factor, but Brexit was more of a factor, although you could link the two because of the portrayal of Labours Brexit position of being on the fence being attributed to Corbyn
 
I do love the fact that you seem to consider this government as somehow not part of the Metropolitan elite, with the interest of the majority uppermost in their minds, but hey ho.

I dont as they all piss in the same, stinking rancid pot but Labour did the almost impossible and that is piss off and frankly abuse its working class northern heartlands and that same heartland let them know it at the ballot box.

It will go down as one of the biggest mistakes in political history.
 
I did plenty mate, Corbyn was a factor, but Brexit was more of a factor, although you could link the two because of the portrayal of Labours Brexit position of being on the fence being attributed to Corbyn

Vic spent the entire campaign on the phone to his mates i think, an echo chamber.

Labour lost because of its remain stance and because a lifetime EU sceptic in Corbyn betrayed not only his own beliefs but those of millions of his normally loyal core vote.
 
One of lifes big mysteries to me, is why the working class continually vote gainst their own interests.

Judging by what you write and believe mate, it's no surprise why you can't understand
why they do.
You're not alone, many socialists, after seeing their hopes dashed yet again,
also wonder why, O'Brien wonders why, Michael Foot wondered why, all of them do.
What their blind belief doesn't allow for is the possibility they may be wrong,
they see it enacted, see the chaos, the misery, and still they believe, and so they
start their dreary lectures again, and prepare for another futile tilt at it.
And after, they follow up with... Why?
 
I saw from the inside how Labour staff worked to prevent a Labour government

The work of senior Labour staffers to stop Labour winning is only just starting to come out.

Nearly 5 years ago, Jeremy Corbyn pushed open the doors into the spacious and airy Offices of the Leader of the Opposition, overlooking the River Thames on Victoria Embankment. He already had some suspicions at this point, but he could never have fully comprehended what was being plotted against him less than half a mile away at Labour's headquarters on Victoria Street.

Today is the deadline for submissions to the internal Labour inquiry, chaired by Martin Forde QC, which is examining the past behaviour of former senior party staff. I've just written to the inquiry and these were my experiences.

As one of the first staff appointments in the office of the former Shadow Chancellor, John McDonnell, I worked on the same corridor as Corbyn's team. I was new to the Labour Party, with a background in climate activism, and mostly unaware of all its different political affiliations and factions. This was something I shared with many of my colleagues who also weren’t from the world of machine politics. We were in for quite a shock when we were confronted with the machine of Labour HQ.

When I’d started previous jobs I’d arrive to some kind of handover notes. But when Corbyn and McDonnell walked in on day one, the small team that had joined after working on Corbyn’s leadership campaign turned up to find that someone had prepared for our arrival in a more unconventional way: many of the computers had gone missing and the offices weren’t properly set up.

“The few computers that were in the office were the oldest ones possible and they kept crashing all the time”, a former senior adviser to Jeremy Corbyn tells me. “The situation was so dire that one time after a day on the road with Jeremy I came back to find that a new colleague had taken my screen because he didn't have one.”

The situation in John McDonnell’s offices was even worse. “When we took up the offices they were completely gutted of their contents. There were only half pulled out staples in the walls and bits of blue tack. The desks were without chairs let alone computers and I had to work off my own mobile and laptop”, my former colleague James Mills, who was John McDonnell’s Head of Communications, remembers all too well.

I don't remember anyone ever getting to the bottom of where the computers had disappeared to. But the responsibility for ensuring the offices were set up was Labour HQ’s and this was to be a first warning sign.

Some of the behaviour of senior officials at Labour HQ has already been documented in the 860-page leaked Labour report. But there’s a lot more that went on behind the scenes and I think it’s important that people have the whole story.

Another constant battle that took place was over the hiring of staff. Almost every appointment was either delayed, frustrated or blocked by Labour HQ, which had control of the party's finances. “A full year into Jeremy's leadership, we still only had around 16 members of staff which was about half the amount compared to when Ed Miliband was leader”, the former senior Corbyn adviser tells me. James Meadway, a former treasury economist and chief economist at the New Economics Foundation, had to be seconded from one of the trade unions to serve as Economic Advisor in McDonnell’s team after the party repeatedly refused to hire him.

Relationships were so strained that colleagues would regularly turn up to meetings with party staff, get back to their desks, and be left feeling horrified on learning that the contents of the meeting had already been leaked to journalists. This became a major headache as it was almost impossible to plan effectively without the ability to share vital information between the leader’s office and party HQ. Senior aides close to Corbyn were regularly forced to withhold information on policy announcements until the very last minute for fear of leaks.

This fear had the effect of putting most people on edge and helped contribute to an office in a justified state of paranoia.

It was in these early days that one Corbyn aide aptly renamed the party's HQ from its official name – Southside – to the 'Darkside', a term which quickly caught on – reinforcing a sense of them and us.

The most shocking sabotage I personally witnessed was an encounter with the notoriously difficult regional offices who were often the most ideologically opposed to the Corbyn regime. At my request, attempts were made to organise a rally for John McDonnell via one of the regional offices. Given that John was one of the most senior members of the shadow cabinet, I expected my request to be met with enthusiasm.

When I found out that the location they had chosen was in the middle of nowhere I was left flabbergasted. I was told this tactic had been used before – apparently to avoid lots of members showing up and being won round by the new regime.

There were hundreds more incidents like this that I'm aware of; press releases regularly blocked from going out, staff members briefing against Corbyn's office, weekly planning grids leaked including the 2019 General Election grid, an almost constant refusal to share content on the party's social media platforms and the coordination of staff resignations to damage the party. As a political first, the party’s 2017 manifesto was also infamously leaked.

Perhaps the most kafkaesque example is the bizarre story of party officials designing Facebook adverts to be seen by only Corbyn’s team. A party official helpfully explained the strategy to the Sunday Times:

“They wanted us to spend a fortune on some schemes like the one they had to encourage voter registration, but we only had to spend about £5,000 to make sure Jeremy’s people, some journalists and bloggers saw it was there on Facebook. And if it was there for them, they thought it must be there for everyone. It wasn’t.”

It gets worse. On the night of the 2017 General Election I was in the press team at the party's HQ. I’ll never forget the deathly silence and the looks on the faces of those staffers that we knew to have been plotting against Corbyn since day one. While we celebrated robbing Theresa May of her majority, party staffers mourned in the room next door: “they are cheering and we are silent and grey faced. Opposite to what I had been working towards for the last couple of years!!, one senior staffer allegedly wrote on WhatsApp that night, according to the leaked report.

They were so confident Corbyn was going to do badly that just before the exit poll results came in, all of Corbyn’s staff had their access to Labour HQ revoked.

It's important to note that all of the key staff implicated have already moved on from working for the party. But the Forde Inquiry must heed the outcry and astonishment from many of the party's half a million members. For the inquiry's recommendations to be seen as credible, a lifetime ban for these former Labour staffers has got to be the bare minimum.

Jeremy Corbyn may have been ideologically further away from his fellow Labour MPs than any former leader, but that doesn't justify the relentless nature of the attacks. What Corbyn and his team had to deal with behind the scenes went far beyond factionalism and showed a scorched-earth mentality. Not only did they not want Labour to win under Corbyn, they seemed to be actively trying to lose.

Once the dust finally settles on the Corbyn-era, historians may ponder how different things might have been if these Labour staffers, and numerous Labour MPs, had spent their energies supporting their leader rather than working against him.

The number of extra votes in marginal seats that Labour needed in 2017 to give Corbyn a chance of being prime minister was an agonising 2,227. This will forever remain a sore point for many of us. Because as the leaked report exposed – we know that in 2017 party resources never reached many of the winnable seats that they should have, with allies of the small faction in party HQ standing in safe seats seen as the first priority.

We were a young and diverse team, mostly new to electoral politics and passionate about our jobs. Of course we made mistakes. But we came incredibly close to changing this country’s politics for good. Without the actions of this small group of highly experienced saboteurs, I genuinely believe we would now be three years into a Labour government investing in our NHS and public services – an outcome which surely would have better prepared the country for the Coronavirus pandemic.

https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/op...abour-staff-worked-prevent-labour-government/
 
I saw from the inside how Labour staff worked to prevent a Labour government

The work of senior Labour staffers to stop Labour winning is only just starting to come out.

Nearly 5 years ago, Jeremy Corbyn pushed open the doors into the spacious and airy Offices of the Leader of the Opposition, overlooking the River Thames on Victoria Embankment. He already had some suspicions at this point, but he could never have fully comprehended what was being plotted against him less than half a mile away at Labour's headquarters on Victoria Street.

Today is the deadline for submissions to the internal Labour inquiry, chaired by Martin Forde QC, which is examining the past behaviour of former senior party staff. I've just written to the inquiry and these were my experiences.

As one of the first staff appointments in the office of the former Shadow Chancellor, John McDonnell, I worked on the same corridor as Corbyn's team. I was new to the Labour Party, with a background in climate activism, and mostly unaware of all its different political affiliations and factions. This was something I shared with many of my colleagues who also weren’t from the world of machine politics. We were in for quite a shock when we were confronted with the machine of Labour HQ.

When I’d started previous jobs I’d arrive to some kind of handover notes. But when Corbyn and McDonnell walked in on day one, the small team that had joined after working on Corbyn’s leadership campaign turned up to find that someone had prepared for our arrival in a more unconventional way: many of the computers had gone missing and the offices weren’t properly set up.

“The few computers that were in the office were the oldest ones possible and they kept crashing all the time”, a former senior adviser to Jeremy Corbyn tells me. “The situation was so dire that one time after a day on the road with Jeremy I came back to find that a new colleague had taken my screen because he didn't have one.”

The situation in John McDonnell’s offices was even worse. “When we took up the offices they were completely gutted of their contents. There were only half pulled out staples in the walls and bits of blue tack. The desks were without chairs let alone computers and I had to work off my own mobile and laptop”, my former colleague James Mills, who was John McDonnell’s Head of Communications, remembers all too well.

I don't remember anyone ever getting to the bottom of where the computers had disappeared to. But the responsibility for ensuring the offices were set up was Labour HQ’s and this was to be a first warning sign.

Some of the behaviour of senior officials at Labour HQ has already been documented in the 860-page leaked Labour report. But there’s a lot more that went on behind the scenes and I think it’s important that people have the whole story.

Another constant battle that took place was over the hiring of staff. Almost every appointment was either delayed, frustrated or blocked by Labour HQ, which had control of the party's finances. “A full year into Jeremy's leadership, we still only had around 16 members of staff which was about half the amount compared to when Ed Miliband was leader”, the former senior Corbyn adviser tells me. James Meadway, a former treasury economist and chief economist at the New Economics Foundation, had to be seconded from one of the trade unions to serve as Economic Advisor in McDonnell’s team after the party repeatedly refused to hire him.

Relationships were so strained that colleagues would regularly turn up to meetings with party staff, get back to their desks, and be left feeling horrified on learning that the contents of the meeting had already been leaked to journalists. This became a major headache as it was almost impossible to plan effectively without the ability to share vital information between the leader’s office and party HQ. Senior aides close to Corbyn were regularly forced to withhold information on policy announcements until the very last minute for fear of leaks.

This fear had the effect of putting most people on edge and helped contribute to an office in a justified state of paranoia.

It was in these early days that one Corbyn aide aptly renamed the party's HQ from its official name – Southside – to the 'Darkside', a term which quickly caught on – reinforcing a sense of them and us.

The most shocking sabotage I personally witnessed was an encounter with the notoriously difficult regional offices who were often the most ideologically opposed to the Corbyn regime. At my request, attempts were made to organise a rally for John McDonnell via one of the regional offices. Given that John was one of the most senior members of the shadow cabinet, I expected my request to be met with enthusiasm.

When I found out that the location they had chosen was in the middle of nowhere I was left flabbergasted. I was told this tactic had been used before – apparently to avoid lots of members showing up and being won round by the new regime.

There were hundreds more incidents like this that I'm aware of; press releases regularly blocked from going out, staff members briefing against Corbyn's office, weekly planning grids leaked including the 2019 General Election grid, an almost constant refusal to share content on the party's social media platforms and the coordination of staff resignations to damage the party. As a political first, the party’s 2017 manifesto was also infamously leaked.

Perhaps the most kafkaesque example is the bizarre story of party officials designing Facebook adverts to be seen by only Corbyn’s team. A party official helpfully explained the strategy to the Sunday Times:

“They wanted us to spend a fortune on some schemes like the one they had to encourage voter registration, but we only had to spend about £5,000 to make sure Jeremy’s people, some journalists and bloggers saw it was there on Facebook. And if it was there for them, they thought it must be there for everyone. It wasn’t.”

It gets worse. On the night of the 2017 General Election I was in the press team at the party's HQ. I’ll never forget the deathly silence and the looks on the faces of those staffers that we knew to have been plotting against Corbyn since day one. While we celebrated robbing Theresa May of her majority, party staffers mourned in the room next door: “they are cheering and we are silent and grey faced. Opposite to what I had been working towards for the last couple of years!!, one senior staffer allegedly wrote on WhatsApp that night, according to the leaked report.

They were so confident Corbyn was going to do badly that just before the exit poll results came in, all of Corbyn’s staff had their access to Labour HQ revoked.

It's important to note that all of the key staff implicated have already moved on from working for the party. But the Forde Inquiry must heed the outcry and astonishment from many of the party's half a million members. For the inquiry's recommendations to be seen as credible, a lifetime ban for these former Labour staffers has got to be the bare minimum.

Jeremy Corbyn may have been ideologically further away from his fellow Labour MPs than any former leader, but that doesn't justify the relentless nature of the attacks. What Corbyn and his team had to deal with behind the scenes went far beyond factionalism and showed a scorched-earth mentality. Not only did they not want Labour to win under Corbyn, they seemed to be actively trying to lose.

Once the dust finally settles on the Corbyn-era, historians may ponder how different things might have been if these Labour staffers, and numerous Labour MPs, had spent their energies supporting their leader rather than working against him.

The number of extra votes in marginal seats that Labour needed in 2017 to give Corbyn a chance of being prime minister was an agonising 2,227. This will forever remain a sore point for many of us. Because as the leaked report exposed – we know that in 2017 party resources never reached many of the winnable seats that they should have, with allies of the small faction in party HQ standing in safe seats seen as the first priority.

We were a young and diverse team, mostly new to electoral politics and passionate about our jobs. Of course we made mistakes. But we came incredibly close to changing this country’s politics for good. Without the actions of this small group of highly experienced saboteurs, I genuinely believe we would now be three years into a Labour government investing in our NHS and public services – an outcome which surely would have better prepared the country for the Coronavirus pandemic.

https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/op...abour-staff-worked-prevent-labour-government/

They didn't stand at the booth diverting over 2 million labour voters to vote Tory mate.
 
it's funny how a left wingers narrative always swings to "us and them, persecution, oppression, victims". Just can't help themselves.

Not, "we weren't popular because our ideology is warped and we didn't have the foresight, tactical nous, intelligence and where-with-all to run and manage things properly, which is why our policies end up shit and unpopular and we lose. Our bad".
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top