2? I think only 1 actual investigation where they reviewed footage shot threw a window and concluded he hadn’t breached lockdown rules. This was before it was uncovered that Angela Rayner had also been there - although not sure what difference that makes. The police have so far declined to reopen as they say they don’t prosecute retrospectively but that’s not the same as an investigation. Whether Starmer has done wrong or not he has exposed the problem with gutter politics - if you want to play in the gutter you better make sure your shit doesn’t smell.
Give it up, you don't need to go down this road to prove your loyalty to the party.
In other news Frank Dobson has resigned his position for corpsing when it was revealed Starmer had a curry.
If you’re referring to me I’m merely seeking to correct (or be corrected) on the fact there weren’t 2 investigations. Or is there a some new rule that we can’t question if something is actually correct or not?
The two situations aren't comparable. It's just a waste of energy to even pretend they are.
Yeah but desperate times call for desperate measures after this mornings interview
The two situations aren't comparable. It's just a waste of energy to even pretend they are.
Will he be sufficiently embarrassed that he is forced to cross the aisles of BM?
Reform UK or Lib Dems... that is the question?
Lol. Only if you cross and uncross you legs in a suggestive way you minx.
Not to mention a sizeable chunk of the PLP.He should try having the guardian, BBC, times, and telegraph on his case as well.