mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
You are being silly with that response.Sorry my bad. Everything Starmer does is OK then because some people before him made mistakes, so he's off the hook for everything he does. Silly me.
You are being silly with that response.Sorry my bad. Everything Starmer does is OK then because some people before him made mistakes, so he's off the hook for everything he does. Silly me.
Cameron ?I agree with the comment about Cameron, while i didnt like him he was better than what followed.
That said he did put his dick in a dead pigs head so hardly a high bar.
He also had history when at Channel 4 for making things disappear.Cameron ?
Don't think he was whiter than white ?
Didn't he have some scandal, when not a MP, trying to gain Parliamentary influence and favour, for a company he was employed by ?
Always looked a smarmy sausage to me...
I like sausages but I wouldn't take a bite outta Cameron.Cameron ?
Don't think he was whiter than white ?
Didn't he have some scandal, when not a MP, trying to gain Parliamentary influence and favour, for a company he was employed by ?
Always looked a smarmy sausage to me...
Agree.I like sausages but I wouldn't take a bite outta Cameron.
I'm not saying I agreed with his policies or decisions, but as a leader at least he was a relatively serious person rather than the drips and clowns we have had since. It's a sorry state of affairs.You don't think Cameron's/Osbourne's austerity is partly to blame for the state of things today, including the emrgence of the far right and its gullible base?
Which of hasn't done that after six pints of Old Tom ?I agree with the comment about Cameron, while i didnt like him he was better than what followed.
That said he did put his dick in a dead pigs head so hardly a high bar.
That was not implicit in his post by any stretch of the imagination.Sorry my bad. Everything Starmer does is OK then because some people before him made mistakes, so he's off the hook for everything he does. Silly me.
Your post comparing Starmer to other PMs expressly invites reference to other PMs in response. Ridiculous to suggest otherwise.Sorry my bad. Everything Starmer does is OK then because some people before him made mistakes, so he's off the hook for everything he does. Silly me.
That persons doesn't exist at the moment and unfortunately doesn't exist in any of our political parties at present.Someone who isn't a puppet for Labour Together (and dare I say Israel) someone with actual principles, beliefs and compassion would be a start and a change.
Cameron ?
Don't think he was whiter than white ?
Didn't he have some scandal, when not a MP, trying to gain Parliamentary influence and favour, for a company he was employed by ?
Always looked a smarmy sausage to me...
I'm not saying I agreed with his policies or decisions, but as a leader at least he was a relatively serious person rather than the drips and clowns we have had since. It's a sorry state of affairs.
He was far from Whiter than White, and i had no time for him eigher, however those thst followed were just as bad if nit worse in my opinion.Cameron ?
Don't think he was whiter than white ?
Didn't he have some scandal, when not a MP, trying to gain Parliamentary influence and favour, for a company he was employed by ?
Always looked a smarmy sausage to me...
He was identified as a significant security risk to the UK due to his links to China and Russia and his leaking of sensitive information re insider trading. Even that should have been enough to prevent his being appointed as US Ambassador even if he'd never met Epstein. Starmer had other ideas though.I mean it's fairly fucking obvious they thought a nonce twat like Mandelson would suit the current incumbent of the White House. I can see the logic, twisted as it is. To not foresee an issue arising from the promised release of the Epstein files is just foolish. I do think he should walk, it's just that he seems to be handling the Iran shitshow as well as could reasonably be expected and whoever replaces him could fuck it right up, especially if its Lammy.
Been saying this for ages, the country needs a much more functional Labour and Conservative Party and fast, because at the moment the lunatic fringes on both sides are going to take over the country.Badenoch getting her profile up.
In some ways it not a bad thing as it might put reform back in their tiny box for a while.
Been saying this for ages, the country needs a much more functional Labour and Conservative Party and fast, because at the moment the lunatic fringes on both sides are going to take over the country.
Starmer is obviously fucked, Badenoch is a load of nonthing, so people are flocking to snake oil con artists like Farage and Polanski for answers.
Sums up the state of British politics when people are arguing about who is the biggest liar Starmer or Johnson. Let's be honest, when you look at the list since Tony Blair, only David Cameron bears a semblance to a proper PM and he made one of the worst decisions in recent memory to let the public vote on Brexit. The fact that the major parties are full of absolute weapons is the reason crank parties like Reform & Green are being talked about.