Keir Starmer

Comparing the Colston statue and a holocaust memorial in that way is laughable. A more apt comparison would be if a statue of Hitler was being constructed.
 
Comparing the Colston statue and a holocaust memorial in that way is laughable. A more apt comparison would be if a statue of Hitler was being constructed.

You misunderstand.

I'm personally in favour of the Holocaust memorial but that is beside the point, the project has powerful forces behind it, that is simply a fact and it commemorates something this country had no direct responsibility for, so the establishment is comfortable with it.

Colston is a different matter, he played a prominent part in something this country was very much directly responsible for.

His statue was constructed in 1895, long after his death, and as was the fashion his slavery ties were ignored in favour of his philanthropy.

Colston's removal is loudly condemned by the establishment, there are no powerful forces defending his removal.

It's easy to condemn other peoples wickedness, a little less easy to condemn ones own.
 
Last edited:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politic...ens-key-figures-including-angela-rayner-face/

Labour crisis deepens as key figures including Angela Rayner face anti-Semitism investigations​


"The Jeremy Corbyn crisis deepened on Friday night as the Labour Party confirmed that it would consider anti-Semitism complaints against a number of its own MPs including the deputy leader, Angela Rayner.

It came after the party leader, Sir Keir Starmer, pledged to set up an independent disciplinary process following the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) anti-Semitism report, which found Labour responsible for "unlawful acts".

In response to the report, the Campaign Against Anti-Semitism (CAA), which formally referred the party to the EHRC two years ago, submitted complaints against 15 sitting Labour MPs.

The complaints include accusations of "anti-Semitic discourse" by both the former shadow home secretary Diane Abbott and the former shadow education secretary Rebecca-Long Bailey, who was sacked by Sir Keir in an anti-Semitism row in June.

Gideon Falter, the chief executive of the CAA, said: "Sir Keir Starmer now has a long list of reforms to make, including establishing an independent disciplinary process so that those who put Britain's Jews in fear for their future in this country can at last be held to account for their deeds."

Held account for their deeds eh?
 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politic...ens-key-figures-including-angela-rayner-face/

Labour crisis deepens as key figures including Angela Rayner face anti-Semitism investigations​


"The Jeremy Corbyn crisis deepened on Friday night as the Labour Party confirmed that it would consider anti-Semitism complaints against a number of its own MPs including the deputy leader, Angela Rayner.

It came after the party leader, Sir Keir Starmer, pledged to set up an independent disciplinary process following the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) anti-Semitism report, which found Labour responsible for "unlawful acts".

In response to the report, the Campaign Against Anti-Semitism (CAA), which formally referred the party to the EHRC two years ago, submitted complaints against 15 sitting Labour MPs.

The complaints include accusations of "anti-Semitic discourse" by both the former shadow home secretary Diane Abbott and the former shadow education secretary Rebecca-Long Bailey, who was sacked by Sir Keir in an anti-Semitism row in June.

Gideon Falter, the chief executive of the CAA, said: "Sir Keir Starmer now has a long list of reforms to make, including establishing an independent disciplinary process so that those who put Britain's Jews in fear for their future in this country can at last be held to account for their deeds."


Held account for their deeds eh?
I suspect Starmer will find he was standing rather too close to the fan and when the shit hit it. It seems even his full acceptance of the report and fairly firm words/ commitment to change were not enough. First they came for corbyn, then they came for Rayner....
 
I suspect Starmer will find he was standing rather too close to the fan and when the shit hit it. It seems even his full acceptance of the report and fairly firm words/ commitment to change were not enough. First they came for corbyn, then they came for Rayner....
Robespierre was a lawyer too
 
I suspect Starmer will find he was standing rather too close to the fan and when the shit hit it. It seems even his full acceptance of the report and fairly firm words/ commitment to change were not enough. First they came for corbyn, then they came for Rayner....

Yep, he's dropped a right bollock.

He thought he'd given the CAA enough, a cringe-worthy mea culpa, a few sacrificial lambs, including his predecessors scalp, the walk of shame for 500,000 Labour Party members.

But it'll never be enough, they have him by the balls and they'll never let go.
 
I suspect Starmer will find he was standing rather too close to the fan and when the shit hit it. It seems even his full acceptance of the report and fairly firm words/ commitment to change were not enough. First they came for corbyn, then they came for Rayner....

well if all that guard are removed then it's better for everyone going forward. We could call what rises from the Phoenix ashes "New Labour" or something...
 
The usual suspects ride again.

Not one word of condemnation or from the Three Socialist Musketeers for abhorrent racism, or any sense of shame that it's happening in their supposedly anti-racist party. Not the hope that it gets dealt with swiftly and decisively, thereby removing the stain of racism from their party.
I have condemned racism at every opportunity, I have said repeatedly there is no place for it in society. I will not apologise for something I have no part in, I have not been antisemitic, I will never be antisemitic and I repeat I am against all forms of discrimination. I am also against what appears to be a witch hunt by the CAA, who are not just attacking Labour politicians but politicians of other parties too on what looks like plainly ridiculous charges. They accused Kaufman of being antisemitic because of what he said under Parliamentary privilige. What are they trying to do, destroy our democracy. Is it really antisemitic to criticise the Israeli government? Because if it is that means they can act with impunity and that puts them on a level with dictatorships around the world who also act with impunity. Some of the charges the CAA are making don't even have dates for the alleged transgressions.

I am sorry Col you are now sounding like one of those idiotic EDL dickheads who demands every Muslim apologises for a suicide bomber.
 
I have condemned racism at every opportunity, I have said repeatedly there is no place for it in society. I will not apologise for something I have no part in, I have not been antisemitic, I will never be antisemitic and I repeat I am against all forms of discrimination. I am also against what appears to be a witch hunt by the CAA, who are not just attacking Labour politicians but politicians of other parties too on what looks like plainly ridiculous charges. They accused Kaufman of being antisemitic because of what he said under Parliamentary privilige. What are they trying to do, destroy our democracy. Is it really antisemitic to criticise the Israeli government? Because if it is that means they can act with impunity and that puts them on a level with dictatorships around the world who also act with impunity. Some of the charges the CAA are making don't even have dates for the alleged transgressions.

I am sorry Col you are now sounding like one of those idiotic EDL dickheads who demands every Muslim apologises for a suicide bomber.
Pretty obvious for me that you have the last few days, am I missing something here ?
 
I have condemned racism at every opportunity, I have said repeatedly there is no place for it in society. I will not apologise for something I have no part in, I have not been antisemitic, I will never be antisemitic and I repeat I am against all forms of discrimination. I am also against what appears to be a witch hunt by the CAA, who are not just attacking Labour politicians but politicians of other parties too on what looks like plainly ridiculous charges. They accused Kaufman of being antisemitic because of what he said under Parliamentary privilige. What are they trying to do, destroy our democracy. Is it really antisemitic to criticise the Israeli government? Because if it is that means they can act with impunity and that puts them on a level with dictatorships around the world who also act with impunity. Some of the charges the CAA are making don't even have dates for the alleged transgressions.

I am sorry Col you are now sounding like one of those idiotic EDL dickheads who demands every Muslim apologises for a suicide bomber.
The leaked Labour report revealed how the Livingstone case was subject to delays purely to discredit the leadership. How many others? Where's the condemnation of the wing of the party that weaponised a serious issue such as anti-Semitism for factional reasons?
 
The leaked Labour report revealed how the Livingstone case was subject to delays purely to discredit the leadership. How many others? Where's the condemnation of the wing of the party that weaponised a serious issue such as anti-Semitism for factional reasons?
Brushed under the carpet so it doesn't upset Keith's applecart now he has seized power. I don't think the real truth behind it will ever fully come out because a lot of people cant afford it to. The way Keith quickly paid people off said to me there are a lot of people with a lot to hide , they didn't care who they upset, who they attacked, who they aggrieved as long as they got there way. Maybe they did weaponise antisemitism, but you can bet your house that it will never be proven.
 
Brushed under the carpet so it doesn't upset Keith's applecart now he has seized power. I don't think the real truth behind it will ever fully come out because a lot of people cant afford it to. The way Keith quickly paid people off said to me there are a lot of people with a lot to hide , they didn't care who they upset, who they attacked, who they aggrieved as long as they got there way. Maybe they did weaponise antisemitism, but you can bet your house that it will never be proven.
I don't think it's a maybe and the rest of your post explains why. The idea that Labour can now reclaim it's moral high ground as a truly anti-racist party with a machine that used a serious issue as a political football to purge the left is laughable.
 
I have condemned racism at every opportunity, I have said repeatedly there is no place for it in society. I will not apologise for something I have no part in, I have not been antisemitic, I will never be antisemitic and I repeat I am against all forms of discrimination. I am also against what appears to be a witch hunt by the CAA, who are not just attacking Labour politicians but politicians of other parties too on what looks like plainly ridiculous charges. They accused Kaufman of being antisemitic because of what he said under Parliamentary privilige. What are they trying to do, destroy our democracy. Is it really antisemitic to criticise the Israeli government? Because if it is that means they can act with impunity and that puts them on a level with dictatorships around the world who also act with impunity. Some of the charges the CAA are making don't even have dates for the alleged transgressions.

I am sorry Col you are now sounding like one of those idiotic EDL dickheads who demands every Muslim apologises for a suicide bomber.

You don't have to apologise to bullies.

He knows this sum total of fuck all is nothing more than politics by others means.
 
I am sorry Col you are now sounding like one of those idiotic EDL dickheads who demands every Muslim apologises for a suicide bomber.

Much as I disagree with pb on this and don't like being dictated to, let's not turn this onto a pile on or it sort of proves his point.

You don't have to apologise to bullies.

He knows this sum total of fuck all is nothing more than politics by others means.

You have proved my point. You are resolutely anti-racist. Unless it's your mates being racist. Then their racism becomes a "weapon". Thanks.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top