Kelechi Iheanacho - 2016/17 Performances

Status
Not open for further replies.
We stand against the Rooneyfication of Aguero (Rooneyfication being the phenomenon in which a deteriorating/off-form player is retained in the starting line-up based on his reputation and profile, as opposed to current form and utility, to the glaring detriment of the team).
Who is this 'we' that you are speaking for?
 
In the same way dropping Hart improved his form, and so on. It could be a boot up the arse, it could be a well needed rest or from not being 100%. There are always reasons behind changing things up, and let's be honest, we're talking about alternating our options because we have a fantastic talent who's playing and providing goals when he gets in the team, not dropping Aguero because why the hell not.
Having non of that. Fit kun starts. End of it.
 
You don't like questions do you,for the record i love nacho but he is way behind sergio in age and experience so if pep wants to bring him on slowly then i am ok with that
Sorry, but Pep needs to sit Aguero down and tell him in no uncertain terms that if he refuses to pass the ball and bring his teammates into the game in his next game, he's on the bench. In your worship of Aguero, you seem not to understand that what he does is unfair to his teammates. They should not have to be running up and down hoping he would do the decent thing and pass when they are in space.
 
Sorry, but Pep needs to sit Aguero down and tell him in no uncertain terms that if he refuses to pass the ball and bring his teammates into the game in his next game, he's on the bench. In your worship of Aguero, you seem not to understand that what he does is unfair to his teammates. They should not have to be running up and down hoping he would do the decent thing and pass when they are in space.
I'm not the one who is worshipping a player you are,pep decides that's what he gets paid the big bucks for
 
when he has started he has looked no where near as much as a threat as when he is brought on as a sub.....I think at present he should stay playing this role,......unless we go to playing with two forwards from the start as when leading the line on his own he is nowhere near as effective
 
I'm not the one who is worshipping a player you are,pep decides that's what he gets paid the big bucks for
Your 'Pep decides' line makes no sense. We are here to air opinions. Might as well shut down the forum and all go home since God (sorry, Pep) 'decides'.
 
when he has started he has looked no where near as much as a threat as when he is brought on as a sub.....I think at present he should stay playing this role,......unless we go to playing with two forwards from the start as when leading the line on his own he is nowhere near as effective

and this rubbish about aguero no passing is just that.....rubbish!

go and watch the highlights that are on the official site..........he makes numerous passes to people and links play well and that is just the highlights....there was one occasion where he rand half the length of the pitch and got his shot off.....but I don't understand why people are moaning at that...we have seen countless times that he scores in those situations....ok he didnt this time and put his shot wide but getting the ball into the middle was almost impossible due to defenders in the way
 
I don't think you know what the term 'debate' means. You clearly take offence to those who hold a different opinion.

It's always been the mantra on here. It'll never change. Debate doesn't even come into it, just look at a few suggesting Sergio may benefit from being dropped. Instead of putting forward their views to have a discussion, one poster was just met with "fucking laughable" etc.
 
It's always been the mantra on here. It'll never change. Debate doesn't even come into it, just look at a few suggesting Sergio may benefit from being dropped. Instead of putting forward their views to have a discussion, one poster was just met with "fucking laughable" etc.
He has edited that post to include the last sentence to make out i was being unreasonable which i wasn't
 
He has edited that post to include the last sentence to make out i was being unreasonable which i wasn't

Fair enough, I didn't aim it specifically at you kaz, just agreeing with a point of his about this board. If anyone was referred to specifically in my post, you can find their posts in previous pages.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top