Ah! But there is lies the rub, you see Galloway questions the legitimacy of the State of Israel, Anti-Semitism has now defined/re-defined to state that anyone who holds such views is anti-Semitic.
Because, as Prestwich_Blue stated in a previous post....
The general definition of anti-Semitism is..."anti-Semitism is hostility or prejudice against Jews
So, as Galloway is questioning the legitimacy of the State of Israel and that legitimacy stems from "The Jewish religion is however completely wedded to the idea of Israel as its spiritual home" then the only logical conclusion one can come to is that anyone who questions Israel's legitimacy, something " The Jewish religion is....completely wedded to" must be anti-Semitic, because to question her legitimacy is to question what it is to be a Jew, which falls neatly under the general definition shown above about holding prejudice against Jews.
I once had a long conversation with a Jewish mate of mine many years ago, he was a left winger, but held the opinion that it was not possible to be a Jew and not a Zionist.
This problem with anti-Semitism that Labour is supposed to have, stems from a very real unresolved dichotomy, not that you'd know it from this media shit storm, but it is a dichotomy for Jews as well.
Are these two absolutes?
1. To be Jewish one must be a Zionist.
2. Anti-Zionism is the same as Anti-Semitism.