west didsblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Oct 2011
- Messages
- 32,414
Thought his performance was a bit like Sterling's on Saturday. Created two or three of his teams best chances but was shit for the rest of the game.
That's more like the Shaelumstash I normally have common cause with. I'll leave this thread at that.I totally agree that Wilmots got it wrong.
To play Fellaini at number 10 when Hazard and DeBrune are on the same pitch is bordering on lunacy.
I wouldn't like DeBruyne to be Superman either, I'd just like him to complete simple 10 yards passes, put in a bit more effort, and get involved in general play a bit more.
Don't know why people have Belgium as a dark horse. They are shite. A bigger let down than England's Golden Generation.
That's about spot on.Thought his performance was a bit like Sterling's on Saturday. Created two or three of his teams best chances but was shit for the rest of the game.
Don't know why people have Belgium as a dark horse. They are shite. A bigger let down than England's Golden Generation.
Indeed.Don't know why people have Belgium as a dark horse. They are shite. A bigger let down than England's Golden Generation.
Indeed.
And they play just like England's "Golden Generation"; players played out of position and not a single player in the team is a good passer of the ball so they look dreadful to watch (it's three passes-give it away, three passes-give it away, two passes give it away, one pass-give it away, four passes-give it away).
A very very overrated squad of players with three decent forwards in Hazard, de Bruyne and Carrasco (who didn't even start!).
Not a chance. There's no such thing as a free role in Peps team. Each player has to stick to their position religiously.We'll probably have 5 attacking players, all playing in a "free" role.