Kia in talk's with AC. (merged)

[SWP's back]

He's done so many things in the last 11 months to warrant being sacked, why anyone defends him I have no idea. I very much doubt that this City will take it up the behind from him, even his own union rep said he had pushed it too far this time. The silence from City is not because he has us over a barrel, its because we have him over one, and we are being very careful about what we say. He's already been found guilty of breaches of his contract, that was before he f**ked off 3 weeks ago.

We told him he had to be in work, yet he failed to show, and hasn't returned (though I'm sure City are grateful he's keeping his poison away from the club at the moment), if we are still paying him, we will recover it in perfectly justifiable fines.

His value will have diminished, but we still hold the cards, and he can't use the 10% of games rule because he isn't here to play even if we wanted him to.

His main value to us, was in helping us win the cup, and qualify for the CL, we will still get a fee, and getting him out of the club will be a bonus even if it is a reduced price.

Let him f**k someone else over.

Well said

 

[hgblue]

He's done so many things in the last 11 months to warrant being sacked, why anyone defends him I have no idea. I very much doubt that this City will take it up the behind from him, even his own union rep said he had pushed it too far this time. The silence from City is not because he has us over a barrel, its because we have him over one, and we are being very careful about what we say. He's already been found guilty of breaches of his contract, that was before he f**ked off 3 weeks ago.

We told him he had to be in work, yet he failed to show, and hasn't returned (though I'm sure City are grateful he's keeping his poison away from the club at the moment), if we are still paying him, we will recover it in perfectly justifiable fines.

His value will have diminished, but we still hold the cards, and he can't use the 10% of games rule because he isn't here to play even if we wanted him to.

His main value to us, was in helping us win the cup, and qualify for the CL, we will still get a fee, and getting him out of the club will be a bonus even if it is a reduced price.

Let him f**k someone else over.

His manager told him, very publicly, that he'd never play for City again. This is why he has us over a barrel. Not a difficult concept to grasp and why a few of us said that Mancini should have kept his mouth shut.

 

[SWP's back]

He's done so many things in the last 11 months to warrant being sacked, why anyone defends him I have no idea. I very much doubt that this City will take it up the behind from him, even his own union rep said he had pushed it too far this time. The silence from City is not because he has us over a barrel, its because we have him over one, and we are being very careful about what we say. He's already been found guilty of breaches of his contract, that was before he f**ked off 3 weeks ago.

We told him he had to be in work, yet he failed to show, and hasn't returned (though I'm sure City are grateful he's keeping his poison away from the club at the moment), if we are still paying him, we will recover it in perfectly justifiable fines.

His value will have diminished, but we still hold the cards, and he can't use the 10% of games rule because he isn't here to play even if we wanted him to.

His main value to us, was in helping us win the cup, and qualify for the CL, we will still get a fee, and getting him out of the club will be a bonus even if it is a reduced price.

Let him f**k someone else over.

His manager told him, very publicly, that he'd never play for City again. This is why he has us over a barrel. Not a difficult concept to grasp and why a few of us said that Mancini should have kept his mouth shut.

Again crap. Mancini also said he only had to say sorry. The club found him guilty and he has us over no barrel as much as you'd love to point score against the manager on here (weird how the old cabal is very evident on this thread).

 

[cleavers]

His manager told him, very publicly, that he'd never play for City again. This is why he has us over a barrel. Not a difficult concept to grasp and why a few of us said that Mancini should have kept his mouth shut.

So you and a few others that still want to find fault with Mancini keep saying, it doesn't mean you're right though.

 

[2sheikhs]

If he'd had knuckled down at City he could have led City to trophies and international recognition which could have earned him and his advisors millions

Very very foolish and sad.

Sorry mate but that was never going to happen. It's not part of the plan. Wherever he has been, he has never had any intention of honouring a contract in full. Signing on fees get paid every time you either change clubs or re-negotiate a new contract. The guys just a whore and his pimp is lower than a crocodiles bollocks. He's tried it with the wrong club and he'll come out of this as a very damaged individual.

 

[remoh]

ํYes, very sad indeed, still remember most of his wonderful goals from the past seasons.

Yes, sad and tragic, particularly for him. How soon many of our 'hang him, draw him and quarter him' brigade forget his performances for us, just as with Bellamy, Petrov, Ireland Adebayor etc.
It all reminds me very much of Orwell's 1984. Friends today, enemies tomorrow.

If Ade were to be forgiven by Roberto and brought back into favour next season and banged in goals for fun, what's the betting that some of the lads on here would instantly forget all the abuse which they've sent his way?

Loyalty to a manager is grand, but loyalty to our Club is best. Mancini is coming good for us, but he has been an expensive manager so far in terms of player-management.

Think the word should have read "enema" as the guy is an arse hole !!

Oakie, you will never be a Glen Quagmire (see off-topic), but if your humour keeps improving you could eventually give Syd Little a run for his money!

 

[oakiecokie]

Yes, sad and tragic, particularly for him. How soon many of our 'hang him, draw him and quarter him' brigade forget his performances for us, just as with Bellamy, Petrov, Ireland Adebayor etc.
It all reminds me very much of Orwell's 1984. Friends today, enemies tomorrow.

If Ade were to be forgiven by Roberto and brought back into favour next season and banged in goals for fun, what's the betting that some of the lads on here would instantly forget all the abuse which they've sent his way?

Loyalty to a manager is grand, but loyalty to our Club is best. Mancini is coming good for us, but he has been an expensive manager so far in terms of player-management.

Think the word should have read "enema" as the guy is an arse hole !!

Oakie, you will never be a Glen Quagmire (see off-topic), but if your humour keeps improving you could eventually give Syd Little a run for his money!

Theres not many who can follow Glen and I certainly have no intentions of even trying to compete !
Now behave. ;)<br /><br />-- Sat Nov 26, 2011 9:53 pm --<br /><br />

He's done so many things in the last 11 months to warrant being sacked, why anyone defends him I have no idea. I very much doubt that this City will take it up the behind from him, even his own union rep said he had pushed it too far this time. The silence from City is not because he has us over a barrel, its because we have him over one, and we are being very careful about what we say. He's already been found guilty of breaches of his contract, that was before he f**ked off 3 weeks ago.

We told him he had to be in work, yet he failed to show, and hasn't returned (though I'm sure City are grateful he's keeping his poison away from the club at the moment), if we are still paying him, we will recover it in perfectly justifiable fines.

His value will have diminished, but we still hold the cards, and he can't use the 10% of games rule because he isn't here to play even if we wanted him to.

His main value to us, was in helping us win the cup, and qualify for the CL, we will still get a fee, and getting him out of the club will be a bonus even if it is a reduced price.

Let him f**k someone else over.

Absolutely spot on in so may ways.Well said.

 

[mike1923]

If we were to name him in the squad for a forthcoming match, would the Premier League step in when he fails to be available?

 

[TCIB]

He's done so many things in the last 11 months to warrant being sacked, why anyone defends him I have no idea. I very much doubt that this City will take it up the behind from him, even his own union rep said he had pushed it too far this time. The silence from City is not because he has us over a barrel, its because we have him over one, and we are being very careful about what we say. He's already been found guilty of breaches of his contract, that was before he f**ked off 3 weeks ago.

We told him he had to be in work, yet he failed to show, and hasn't returned (though I'm sure City are grateful he's keeping his poison away from the club at the moment), if we are still paying him, we will recover it in perfectly justifiable fines.

His value will have diminished, but we still hold the cards, and he can't use the 10% of games rule because he isn't here to play even if we wanted him to.

His main value to us, was in helping us win the cup, and qualify for the CL, we will still get a fee, and getting him out of the club will be a bonus even if it is a reduced price.

Let him f**k someone else over.

His manager told him, very publicly, that he'd never play for City again. This is why he has us over a barrel. Not a difficult concept to grasp and why a few of us said that Mancini should have kept his mouth shut.

It is difficult to grasp as you nor i have all the facts so basically im saying your talking fucking bollocks laddy.
You obviously are not an expert on employment law so don't pretend you know shit about the dynamics of this case.
Mancini broke no rules/contracts/laws saying what he did. If it came to it he can use Tevez's reasoning it was a missunderstanding no ?

 

[Rammy Blue]

He's done so many things in the last 11 months to warrant being sacked, why anyone defends him I have no idea. I very much doubt that this City will take it up the behind from him, even his own union rep said he had pushed it too far this time. The silence from City is not because he has us over a barrel, its because we have him over one, and we are being very careful about what we say. He's already been found guilty of breaches of his contract, that was before he f**ked off 3 weeks ago.

We told him he had to be in work, yet he failed to show, and hasn't returned (though I'm sure City are grateful he's keeping his poison away from the club at the moment), if we are still paying him, we will recover it in perfectly justifiable fines.

His value will have diminished, but we still hold the cards, and he can't use the 10% of games rule because he isn't here to play even if we wanted him to.

His main value to us, was in helping us win the cup, and qualify for the CL, we will still get a fee, and getting him out of the club will be a bonus even if it is a reduced price.

Let him f**k someone else over.

At least we're on the same hymn sheet, mate.

There's so much bollocks written on this thread, it really is unbelievable.

The whole concept of "Tevez having us over a barrel" is frankly laughable.

I'm more than happy to stick to my belief that there is a mutual agreement here, between us and the twat, that keeps all parties happy until Jan 1st when we get shut whilst keeping it from getting any dirtier in the media.