Kia Joorabchian Talksport 12pm Thursday 26th.

[glossop is blue]

If he apologized to Bobby and the rest of the team, i'd have him back for the rest of this season. We're in a fantastic position in the league. It would probably benefit both parties. Then fuck him off in the summer when we could get more money for him.
I'd much rather sell him now though but if nobody is going to offer what we want then so be it.

 

[HolisticJim]

I want to specifically address this as it's important.

There is a FIFA ruling known as Article 15 that states that any player who has not appeared in 10% of the games that he is eligible for has the option to walk in a summer transfer period.

This 10% though, is taken over the lifespan of his contract. Tevez will hit nowhere near this even if he doesn't play for City ever again.

The much more pressing concern from us is the Webster Ruling, which says that any player under 28 who has a contract signed more than 3 years ago will be eligible to leave for a small compensation dependent on future wages/earnings. If my timing is right, he SHOULD be able to take advantage of this in the summer shouldn't he? If we take his wages at £200k per week and he'll have two years on his deal, it will only personally cost him £21 million to buy his contract out.


:)

Wrong. It's over the course of a season:

An established professional who has, in the course of the season,
appeared in fewer than ten per cent of the offi cial matches in which
his club has been involved may terminate his contract prematurely
on the ground of sporting just cause. Due consideration shall be
given to the player’s circumstances in the appraisal of such cases. The
existence of a sporting just cause shall be established on a caseby-
case basis. In such a case, sporting sanctions shall not be imposed,
though compensation may be payable. A professional may only
terminate his contract on this basis in the 15 days following the last
offi cial match of the season of the club with which he is registered.

That does not say its over the course of a season.

If I recall correctly, it's over the length of the contract.

Has to be over the course of a contract, otherwise, any player who was injured for a season would be able to leave on a free despite the initial outlay the club spent in signing him.

 

[Jumanji]

↑ Mate someone just pointed it out to me that the first line says over the course of the season.

I skimmed over it.

 

[hgblue]

If he apologized to Bobby and the rest of the team, i'd have him back for the rest of this season. We're in a fantastic position in the league. It would probably benefit both parties. Then fuck him off in the summer when we could get more money for him.
I'd much rather sell him now though but if nobody is going to offer what we want then so be it.

There's more chance of me playing for City than Tevez whilst Mancini is the manager.

 

[oakiecokie]

That does not say its over the course of a season.

If I recall correctly, it's over the length of the contract.

Sorry but am I reading this incorrectly ?

LOL. Fuck me.

Specsavers are open until 5.30 PM !! ;)

 

[i8rags]

the whole Tevez camp are a bunch of cnuts. how much would like to punch the snake til you cant punch no more.

 

[Jumanji]

Sorry but am I reading this incorrectly ?

LOL. Fuck me.

Specsavers are open until 5.30 PM !! ;)

I haven't slept in almost day, and I'm not wearing my contact lenses. Surely you could forgive me for this embarrassing error. :-)

 

[johnny crossan]

I've got it recorded - is it worth putting up?

 

[BoyBlue_1985]

Wrong. It's over the course of a season:

That does not say its over the course of a season.

If I recall correctly, it's over the length of the contract.

Has to be over the course of a contract, otherwise, any player who was injured for a season would be able to leave on a free despite the initial outlay the club spent in signing him.

Well no because he was not available for the matches<br /><br />-- Fri Jan 27, 2012 2:04 pm --<br /><br />

Wrong. It's over the course of a season:

That does not say its over the course of a season.

If I recall correctly, it's over the length of the contract.

Has to be over the course of a contract, otherwise, any player who was injured for a season would be able to leave on a free despite the initial outlay the club spent in signing him.

Well no because he was not available for the matches

 

[BiBaBo]

It must mean 10% of games for which he is available for selection which he's not if he's in Argentina.

The players know what happened in Munich and I doubt any of them want him back, especially Vinny who is definately now part of the club 'Establishment'.