Kolarov - new contract signed (page 17)

Re: Kolarov

Tron Coltrane said:
Bottomless_Sailor said:
Tron Coltrane said:
Replace a 21 year old who had a season with serious flaws, who has never played in the Premiership, with a 28 year old (with four good years left) who led the league in defenders with assists, defends quite well despite the persistent reputation otherwise, and knows how to play with this team and excel in the league.
Surely the point of reversing the roles is that Kolarov would be the Premiership outsider and Moreno would already be ours?

Regardless, please tell me a Premiership great who had played in the Premiership before he had played in the Premiership. Please tell me why our Premiership-winning manager so rarely played Kolarov vs the best attacks. Please tell me what flaws Moreno has that Kolarov doesn't, and who at their respective age would be more likely to be able to iron out those flaws.

Hah... I was just saying that we had something that works great, homie. And I'm not in a hurry to trade something that works great for a chance that something might work great. Best case scenario you break even. As to the other points though...

I can tell you Premiership players who are great -- who had already played in the Premiership -- by suggesting that you can always elect to let another club roll the dice of trying a foreign defender and wait to sign the ones who pan out. Not suggesting that's how to do our business or save money, just answering your riddle with the word "Premiership" in it a lot.

I would imagine that Pellegrini played Clichy against more robust attacks because he's more conservative.

As far as Moreno's flaws, I only caught three games last year. His main flaw seemed to be people dribbling past him a whole bunch though.

All of this by way of saying I agreed with the guy who said the grass is always greener. I think our backyard is nicer than the one a lot of people are coveting. That's it. No worries if you believe otherwise, I just chose to reply because you seemed shocked that someone might have the temerity to disagree.
But doesn't dropping Kolarov for the big games say it all? Usually a manager has an obvious first choice back 5, but that our left back position keeps being rotated suggests that we do not have the solid all-round left back that we deserve yet.

And how do we think the grass is always greener? Is everyone also clamouring for the sale of Kompany/Aguero/Silva/etc?
 
Re: Kolarov

Bottomless_Sailor said:
Tron Coltrane said:
Bottomless_Sailor said:
Surely the point of reversing the roles is that Kolarov would be the Premiership outsider and Moreno would already be ours?

Regardless, please tell me a Premiership great who had played in the Premiership before he had played in the Premiership. Please tell me why our Premiership-winning manager so rarely played Kolarov vs the best attacks. Please tell me what flaws Moreno has that Kolarov doesn't, and who at their respective age would be more likely to be able to iron out those flaws.

Hah... I was just saying that we had something that works great, homie. And I'm not in a hurry to trade something that works great for a chance that something might work great. Best case scenario you break even. As to the other points though...

I can tell you Premiership players who are great -- who had already played in the Premiership -- by suggesting that you can always elect to let another club roll the dice of trying a foreign defender and wait to sign the ones who pan out. Not suggesting that's how to do our business or save money, just answering your riddle with the word "Premiership" in it a lot.

I would imagine that Pellegrini played Clichy against more robust attacks because he's more conservative.

As far as Moreno's flaws, I only caught three games last year. His main flaw seemed to be people dribbling past him a whole bunch though.

All of this by way of saying I agreed with the guy who said the grass is always greener. I think our backyard is nicer than the one a lot of people are coveting. That's it. No worries if you believe otherwise, I just chose to reply because you seemed shocked that someone might have the temerity to disagree.
But doesn't dropping Kolarov for the big games say it all? Usually a manager has an obvious first choice back 5, but that our left back position keeps being rotated suggests that we do not have the solid all-round left back that we deserve yet.

And how do we think the grass is always greener? Is everyone also clamouring for the sale of Kompany/Aguero/Silva/etc?

This is it for me, man. I feel like it's gone a bit Monitor & Merrimack between us at this point, and I'm not sure I'm going to change your mind. Plus I feel like anyone in his good mind has stopped reading our posts now, which isn't much good to a public forum. Here are my exit thoughts:

Rotating fullbacks is essential. They can't play two 90 minute games a week the way we play. The fact that Zabaleta did it is a commentary on what was wrong at RB rather than a sign of something being wrong on the left. As for him not being trusted in critical games, he started the following (among others): Man U. (A), CSKA Moscow (A), Bayern Munich (A), Liverpool (H), Chelsea (H), and Barcelona (A). I think the idea that Pellegrini doesn't trust him in big games is a bit disingenuous. We just have two different style LB's, and Pelle has the luxury of picking horses for courses.

As for the grass always being greener, I think it was a commentary on this syndrome occurring every summer, not occurring with every player. Of course people aren't clamoring to trade in Silva & Aguero just because Messi and Ronaldo are out there.

At the end of the day, though, here's my main point: the best players in the world are gambles. You find the best LB in all of Europe and what you're buying is an 80% chance that it works out (that's an arbitrary number used for an example, before you get stuck on that). There is no such thing as buying a sure thing. Everyone was crying out for Cavani, and he had a decent season with 20 goals, but he was a shadow of the player they thought they were buying at that price (didn't help that it was a position they didn't need to fill). If you don't like the Cavani example, fine: Ozil cost £40m and got slagged off by his own fans for a disastrous dip in form throughout the second half of the campaign.

Every transfer is a gamble. So when you want to trade away something that isn't a gamble -- something that worked just fine last season -- it strikes me as crazy. He is literally a free signing the second he puts pen to paper on a contract extension, in a summer where our spending it very specifically limited. He's best friends with three of our senior players. And he's great. He led the league in assists for defenders. You know how many Moreno provided in La Liga last season? Zero. He's also improved drastically on defensive marking, and I've seen people flying past Alberto in the games I've watched.

So I'd rather keep what we've got. Doesn't sound like I'm going to change your mind, though, and I'm pretty sure you're not changing mine on this one. So maybe we can leave the thread to people who have transfer updates on him. Desperately hope he stays. What can I say, I've grown to love the Serbian Hammer.
 
Re: Kolarov

Tron Coltrane said:
Bottomless_Sailor said:
Tron Coltrane said:
Hah... I was just saying that we had something that works great, homie. And I'm not in a hurry to trade something that works great for a chance that something might work great. Best case scenario you break even. As to the other points though...

I can tell you Premiership players who are great -- who had already played in the Premiership -- by suggesting that you can always elect to let another club roll the dice of trying a foreign defender and wait to sign the ones who pan out. Not suggesting that's how to do our business or save money, just answering your riddle with the word "Premiership" in it a lot.

I would imagine that Pellegrini played Clichy against more robust attacks because he's more conservative.

As far as Moreno's flaws, I only caught three games last year. His main flaw seemed to be people dribbling past him a whole bunch though.

All of this by way of saying I agreed with the guy who said the grass is always greener. I think our backyard is nicer than the one a lot of people are coveting. That's it. No worries if you believe otherwise, I just chose to reply because you seemed shocked that someone might have the temerity to disagree.
But doesn't dropping Kolarov for the big games say it all? Usually a manager has an obvious first choice back 5, but that our left back position keeps being rotated suggests that we do not have the solid all-round left back that we deserve yet.

And how do we think the grass is always greener? Is everyone also clamouring for the sale of Kompany/Aguero/Silva/etc?

This is it for me, man. I feel like it's gone a bit Monitor & Merrimack between us at this point, and I'm not sure I'm going to change your mind. Plus I feel like anyone in his good mind has stopped reading our posts now, which isn't much good to a public forum. Here are my exit thoughts:

Rotating fullbacks is essential. They can't play two 90 minute games a week the way we play. The fact that Zabaleta did it is a commentary on what was wrong at RB rather than a sign of something being wrong on the left. As for him not being trusted in critical games, he started the following (among others): Man U. (A), CSKA Moscow (A), Bayern Munich (A), Liverpool (H), Chelsea (H), and Barcelona (A). I think the idea that Pellegrini doesn't trust him in big games is a bit disingenuous. We just have two different style LB's, and Pelle has the luxury of picking horses for courses.

As for the grass always being greener, I think it was a commentary on this syndrome occurring every summer, not occurring with every player. Of course people aren't clamoring to trade in Silva & Aguero just because Messi and Ronaldo are out there.

At the end of the day, though, here's my main point: the best players in the world are gambles. You find the best LB in all of Europe and what you're buying is an 80% chance that it works out (that's an arbitrary number used for an example, before you get stuck on that). There is no such thing as buying a sure thing. Everyone was crying out for Cavani, and he had a decent season with 20 goals, but he was a shadow of the player they thought they were buying at that price (didn't help that it was a position they didn't need to fill). If you don't like the Cavani example, fine: Ozil cost £40m and got slagged off by his own fans for a disastrous dip in form throughout the second half of the campaign.

Every transfer is a gamble. So when you want to trade away something that isn't a gamble -- something that worked just fine last season -- it strikes me as crazy. He is literally a free signing the second he puts pen to paper on a contract extension, in a summer where our spending it very specifically limited. He's best friends with three of our senior players. And he's great. He led the league in assists for defenders. You know how many Moreno provided in La Liga last season? Zero. He's also improved drastically on defensive marking, and I've seen people flying past Alberto in the games I've watched.

So I'd rather keep what we've got. Doesn't sound like I'm going to change your mind, though, and I'm pretty sure you're not changing mine on this one. So maybe we can leave the thread to people who have transfer updates on him. Desperately hope he stays. What can I say, I've grown to love the Serbian Hammer.
Well, it comes down to one key question - can we do better than Kolarov? Given his defensive qualities, that answer is a resounding of course. Do we want to risk doing better and possibly end up doing worse? In 21 yr old Spanish international Europa League winner Moreno and Clichy being back up I think the answer is yes.

Regarding supposed big games Kolarov played in, vs Manchester United away they were 7th in the league at that point and really not a team with attacking qualities we had to be scared of. CSKA also were not a scarily good attacking team. Bayern Munich away was considered at the time to be a write-off as we didn't expect to win that game by two goals and topple Bayern from top of the group, hence the likes of Aguero and Kompany also didn't start. Liverpool were not title contenders when we played them at home, vs Barcelona away we were 2-0 down and chasing the tie. vs Chelsea at home is the only really big game he started at left-back for us, and what happened? He lost Ivanovic and gave away a goal. What are the other big matches he was trusted in?
 
Re: Kolarov

Bottomless_Sailor said:
Regarding supposed big games Kolarov played in, vs Manchester United away they were 7th in the league at that point and really not a team with attacking qualities we had to be scared of. CSKA also were not a scarily good attacking team. Bayern Munich away was considered at the time to be a write-off as we didn't expect to win that game by two goals and topple Bayern from top of the group, hence the likes of Aguero and Kompany also didn't start. Liverpool were not title contenders when we played them at home, vs Barcelona away we were 2-0 down and chasing the tie. vs Chelsea at home is the only really big game he started at left-back for us, and what happened? He lost Ivanovic and gave away a goal. What are the other big matches he was trusted in?

Have a watch from 5:05 - do you really think Kolarov should stay outside the box marking Ivanovic when Chelsea launch the initial attack down their right and cross a dangerous ball into our area?? Ivanovic presents no immediate threat when that attack is started, it should be a midfielder picking up Ivanovic, someone like the City player nearest to him - Yaya Toure.

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.mcfc.co.uk/citytv/Match-highlights/2014/February/City-v-Chelsea-extended-match-highlights" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mcfc.co.uk/citytv/Match-high ... highlights</a>
 
Re: Kolarov

Tron Coltrane said:
Bottomless_Sailor said:
nomorethaksintimes said:
This is classic 'the grass is always greener' thinking which permeates the transfer forum.

If Kolarov and Moreno had had the same seasons at each others clubs, I guarantee many on here would be calling for us to go big on Kolarov with Moreno being used as a make weight in the deal.
Do you actually believe that?

Not sure if he does, but I do.
I agree. Kolarov's leading the left backs in assists without being a starter.
 
Re: Kolarov

Gianluca Di Marzio ‏@DiMarzio 1m
Kolarov, la Serie A lo rivuole. Ma c’è il contatto col Bayern… <a class="postlink" href="http://fb.me/26Mbv7sWU" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://fb.me/26Mbv7sWU</a>

<a class="postlink" href="http://gianlucadimarzio.com/calciomercato-2/kolarov-la-serie-a-lo-rivuole-ma-contatto-col-bayern/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://gianlucadimarzio.com/calciomerca ... ol-bayern/</a>

Kolarov, the League wants him back. But there is contact with Bayern ...

The left-hand drive market. All, or nearly so, try on that band, a role that seems endangered. The Milanese need, Juve would like an alternative to Asamoah, Sabatini will take at least one for his Rome. Maybe just the Naples feels safe with Ghoulam and the returning Zuniga, that's why instead of pushing to the right blocking Janmaat (cost between 8 and 10 million, but the condition is the sale of May) following last night in Holland-Ghana.

Moreno coming....?
 
Re: Kolarov

It is a surprise that Bayern has thrown their hat in the ring and if there is an offer of an new contract it will make it a lot harder in retaining him.
 
Re: Kolarov

Daz_Blue said:
Forzacitizens said:
Bayern in for him?

Yes

Tancredi Palmeri ‏@tancredipalmeri 20s
Manchester City have been contacted by Bayern for Kolarov, according to Sky Italy

This came from a quote from Roma's chairman saying he knew for certain Bayern were in talks with Kolarov (the quote can be found on the Benatia thread).

Could be true, could be his attempt to do our heads in as we chase Benatia.

If Bayern are in for him, I think he'd probably choose them over us (bigger club, new challenge). I'd be gutted to see him go though. He transformed from utterly average into the best LB in the country last season. Some of his play was fucking incredible.

However, if they wanted to swap him for Alaba, that'd fine by me.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.