yeah whatever !!
Well-Known Member
I'd prefer Jack the Ripper.We need to get Jack Reacher in, he would sort Tebas out for sure
I'd prefer Jack the Ripper.We need to get Jack Reacher in, he would sort Tebas out for sure
He doesn't even have to prove it's true, is my understanding, just that he had a genuine reason to believe it was or there was a public interest in him expressing the view that was wrong.I thought in defamation cases the burden of proof lies on the defendant (Tebas) to prove what he said is true. City doesn't have to prove what he said isn't true.
Spot on.Yep. You are missing the fact he turned down Real Madrid so we must have bunged him a billion. He couldn’t have come here to play in the best team in the best league in the world. A team be followed as a kid and a team that his Dad played for. Nope. He turned down Madrid so we clearly bunged him a billion. What other reason could it be??
I won't hold my breath the Premier League coming out in defence of City, like Ligue 1 quickly did for Paris...
There must come a point where some of our actual sponsors, such as Puma and Nexen, feel their name is being brought into disrepute at accusations they are complicit in dodgy sponsorship deals, and take their own action?
IMHO - Absolutely no way we’ll get any support from anyone or any organisation in this country. The media will be negative - especially the known radio idiots.I won't hold my breath the Premier League coming out in defence of City, like Ligue 1 quickly did for Paris...
There must come a point where some of our actual sponsors, such as Puma and Nexen, feel their name is being brought into disrepute at accusations they are complicit in dodgy sponsorship deals, and take their own action?