Blankomania
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 Aug 2006
- Messages
- 247
pudge said:Whereas bringing on 17 year old would highlight how good everything must be..Blankomania said:karen7 said:You would rather put a kid on to get a goal than someone who has scored the most at chelsea a few months ago?
So when do you give iheanacho a chance. Alright lad you will only play if we are 5 - 0 up and cruising.
It would be a chance for him to be a hero. Remember when richards scored that equalizer against villa, that was a massive boost for him.
Anyway if we are putting lampard on because we desperately need a goal with all the attacking players we have, something has terribly gone wrong.
Espcecially ahead of guy who has scored over 250 goals, solid logic.
Also, for what it's worth Richards started that game as Sun was unavailable for whatever reason.
No its about giving a youngster a chance to prove himself, instead of lampard who will be gone from the club in january. So if hes played longer so scored more goals no point playing a kid, solid logic.
If we were putting things in to context, this whole debate started with putting lampard in instead of kolarov in the everton game when we were 3-1 up...
I really don't care anymore. It all started because i said he won't play much and it will be mostly about fitness. If he scores the winning goal against united i couldn't be happier.