Should have been such a straightforward answer shouldn't it - wonder if there is any other area that would have the same debate. On the same basis Londoners should only be born in City of London - but in contrast anyone from within Greater London seems to be a Londoner. And in Manchester's case some of the argument is based on where administrators decided to draw lines and I noticed recently that the house I lived in from 1971-76 has been moved from Manchester to Trafford - does that mean that if anyone was ever born there before that change was made would no longer be a Manc?
When I moved to Bolton it was made very clear that we were not part of Manchester and they resented being included in Greater Manchester. Clearly in some of the places mentioned above the distinctions are much more blurred and different decisions by administrators could have made Manchester much bigger and the surrounding boroughs a good bit smaller.
Anyway on the original question - can we agree that the last player born in Greater Manchester to score for City was Phil Foden and before that Michael Johnson. The last player born in City of Manchester to score for City was Jon Macken.
When I moved to Bolton it was made very clear that we were not part of Manchester and they resented being included in Greater Manchester. Clearly in some of the places mentioned above the distinctions are much more blurred and different decisions by administrators could have made Manchester much bigger and the surrounding boroughs a good bit smaller.
Anyway on the original question - can we agree that the last player born in Greater Manchester to score for City was Phil Foden and before that Michael Johnson. The last player born in City of Manchester to score for City was Jon Macken.