Sky Blue Thinking
Well-Known Member
Having received a fine for minor breaches ...with no forensic reporting, surely breaches are breaches.Yet the club with the biggest debt just carries on regardless
Having received a fine for minor breaches ...with no forensic reporting, surely breaches are breaches.Yet the club with the biggest debt just carries on regardless
Lineker has a platform on TV to highlight and call out FFP for what it really is and who is behind it but doubt he'd want to upset his paymasters.Exactly what I thought their punishment will be.
They will start their next season in the Premier League on -4 or -6 points.
Gary Lineker will be crying salty tears ,like Gazza did on that old Walkers Crisps advert.
I look forward to the in depth premier league inquiry similar to the witch hunt City have under gone, not holding my breath though.Having received a fine for minor breaches ...with no forensic reporting, surely breaches are breaches.
Easier to gob off what about City.Lineker has a platform on TV to highlight and call out FFP for what it really is and who is behind it but doubt he'd want to upset his paymasters.
Having received a fine for minor breaches ...with no forensic reporting, surely breaches are breaches.
Just give every club a 4 point deduction and be done with it.....I don’t know if the charges all these clubs face are different to ours, I can’t get that invested in it, but the more I see it all happening the more I can see us just walking away with nothing happening to us at all.
It’s all a fucking farce.
The PL/FA is corrupt as per the appointment of Masters involving Dippers and Rags.I still don’t understand why it’s seen as ok for rags to owe their owners £400m for the debt the Glazers transferred onto the club, but if a club like Leicester or Forest overspends an arbitrary amount set by the PL they get points deductions.
I thought all this FFP shit was brought in under the guise of preventing clubs going under like Leeds and Portsmouth did? I don’t think spending £25m over a season will send Leicester or Forest into bankruptcy. But what if the rags had to pay off all their £400m debt in one season? Would they still be able to then go and buy £200m of players in summer?
Why can’t the likes of Leicester just borrow £400m and spend it on players, saying they’re in debt to a bank/owner, so haven’t breached the PL’s rules? How would that be different to rags owing £400m? I genuinely don’t understand.
Is it because these rules were contrived to try and get the rags to win the title most seasons and no-one is allowed to catch up? What am I not understanding here?