Liverpool (H) | PL | Post Match Thread

Liverpool players, fans,sports writers, pundits and all the other City haters are seething about the kicking City gave them. Gives me more joy than watching the game.Goal disallowed and penalty both straightforward descisions, but what about the nasty off the ball foul on Foden by that slimy Szoboszlai caught by the commentator but not by the officials? Nobody talking about that.
The 'Pusher' is one nasty piece of work.
2 handed shove on the villa player last week sending him into the advertising boards.
Did one of Doku yesterday, as Jeremy was speeding away from him, a 2 handed shove in the back sends him over, the ref gave us the free kick and that **** starts moaning about it
 
Fair enough to proper LFC fans, if they admit they well beaten ?
But, read the invited comments on the Guardian report this morning.
The vast majority think the goal should have stood.
Some even say Big Erl's header was a lucky deflection !
LFC have the most one-eyed fans, who can seldom if ever give praise to their opponents.
City must really get on their nerves, as they really believe they will win the league every season...
Slot and several players gave City fair praise admitting they were well beaten. VVD refused to talk about ref decisions. Fair play to him.
 
Did he bottle up Salah or what? You could tell Salah was completely miffed at how the game went. Loved it.
Salah has fallen off a cliff and it’s obvious from his body language, he knows it.

Reminiscent of final season Kev, Gundo, Walker and Yaya. Father Time has gripped him and said come on son turn it in now. Same started to show in Van Dyke.

That said, NOR had a stormer. Nothing new there though he’s been immense this season, as he was last. Going to be an absolute boss.
 
Liverpool players, fans,sports writers, pundits and all the other City haters are seething about the kicking City gave them. Gives me more joy than watching the game.Goal disallowed and penalty both straightforward descisions, but what about the nasty off the ball foul on Foden by that slimy Szoboszlai caught by the commentator but not by the officials? Nobody talking about that.
Can’t make this shit up can you?! Absolutely embarrassing. Always the victim! I hope they have complained and I hope they get absolute pelters from all angles! Got absolutely battered but as per usual, somebody else’s fault! This sort of stuff is what makes beating them so enjoyable.
 
I think Ait-Nouri's best chance is as some sort of attacking player. He's no defender. Looking like a squad player to me at best, but it's still very early days for him.

Then again, I'd also rather see Josko further up the park - I think he could be a genuinely world-class midfielder - whereas rarely a game goes by without him giving me palpitations in defence.

I still think that we haven't been tested properly in defence, that the UCL might find us out, but we're twice the team with Donnarumma and NOR in the lineup, so things definitely looking up. Really appreciating being competitive again.
Fucking hell ive seen some weird takes on here but Gvardiol as a midfielder because we are uncomfortable with him in defence? the only time we have looked secure at the back anytime in the last 18 months is when he starts at CB he solidifies the whole defence, also he is nowhere near mobile enough to run a midfield he would look so out of place in there.
 
I think Rudolph has plenty to offer. We need a strong squad that gives Pep a variety of options and th ability to rotate players. Tijjani needs time to adapt fully to City and English football - a couple of goals would help him along.
Yep. He’s getting there slowly. Was highly rated in Italy and will come good here.
 
" they do not accept the decision was arrived at for subjective reasons " - I might be wrong here, but doesn't the wording of that statement imply that they are claiming that the decision was as a consequence of a biased/corrupt decision by the officials in control of the game ?

Should the PL not be charging LFC for bringing the game into disrepute ?

or are cartel members exempt from the normal rules ?

Aren't there rules about making such claims or are LFC above such laws/rules ?
“Subjective reasons” not nice from Liverpool, the ref believed it was off side.
 
Why is it when a decision goes against the red scousers it’s a travesty and the media go all in calling it out,strange when decisions go against City or other teams it’s deemed as one of those things and it evens itself out over the season or just the shrug of the shoulders and get on with it ..
Red mafia.
 
" they do not accept the decision was arrived at for subjective reasons " - I might be wrong here, but doesn't the wording of that statement imply that they are claiming that the decision was as a consequence of a biased/corrupt decision by the officials in control of the game ?
My first thought was “are they saying John Oliver is a cheat?” but then I thought the wording was all wrong, because it would need to be “objective” not “subjective.”

However, upon a reread, it appears it is CityXtra’s wording, not Liverpool’s, that is wrong in the above posting.

I’d like to see what Liverpool actually said before inferring they were effectively calling Oliver a cheat!

Fucking social media setting the agenda with dodgy reporting will be the death of me!
 
I think Ait-Nouri's best chance is as some sort of attacking player. He's no defender. Looking like a squad player to me at best, but it's still very early days for him.

Then again, I'd also rather see Josko further up the park - I think he could be a genuinely world-class midfielder - whereas rarely a game goes by without him giving me palpitations in defence.

I still think that we haven't been tested properly in defence, that the UCL might find us out, but we're twice the team with Donnarumma and NOR in the lineup, so things definitely looking up. Really appreciating being competitive again.

I despair at times on here.
 
Yeah, but we’re cheats.
As it's a rainy afternoon I have spent a large part of watching YouTube videos of Liverpool fans reactions during the . game. I even squeezed Mark Goldberg in. In fairness to them all they all acknowledged we were far the better side and deserved to win. Yes they had a moan about the disallowed goal but that's fans for you.
In terms of Doku's display everyone thought he was brilliant and MG thought it was the best display from a winger he had watched.
As somebody commented elsewhere it really is the mainstream media who have issues with us not true football fans.
 
They’re all so f’kin butthurt,they refuse to see the obvious.Robertson was offside and was impacting the keepers thoughts and actions,as he was so close.Line of sight with the ball,has fuck all to do with it in this case.I’m sure our friends in the media will give them all the support they need with their little spat with Webb and co,..fuckin unbelievable!!
 
Fucking main news story on sly sports, they even had stuttering karveh, well, stuttering. Apparently the dippers haven’t complained for themselves but for the good of the game, bless em. Fucking help us at candlefield later in the season

And that clearly demonstrates the blatant lying and scheming ideology that runs throughout their fucking cult members.
 
" they do not accept the decision was arrived at for subjective reasons " - I might be wrong here, but doesn't the wording of that statement imply that they are claiming that the decision was as a consequence of a biased/corrupt decision by the officials in control of the game ?

Should the PL not be charging LFC for bringing the game into disrepute ?

or are cartel members exempt from the normal rules ?

Aren't there rules about making such claims or are LFC above such laws/rules ?
Sums them up the fucking fannies.
 
It’s not as simple as that though. Bernardo also moves when Stones scores last season.

The biggest difference is that Robertson is on the same side of the goal as where the ball goes, so I can see that there is more scope for him to be deemed offside.

Had we had the goal disallowed, the VAR/ref threads would be going berserk.

It’s one of those marginal decisions where you could justify both sides and not be wrong. I’m just glad it went our way this time.
I don't know if they really interpret the law this way, but to me, "in the keeper's eyeline" shouldn't just mean "between the keeper and the ball". If the player is in front of the keeper, even if the ball's coming from a slightly different angle, he's still interfering being a visual distraction. This definitely applies to Robertson, but not to Bernie, who was more to the opposite side of the Wolves goalie and he also dropped down to be even less of a visual distraction before the header came in. The bigger justification for ruling out the City goal v Wolves would be that Bernie bumps the goalie before he gets out of the way. Of course, if they decide to rule out goals for fouling the goalkeeper, Arsenal would be mid-table at best this season...
 
They were looking at going nine points clear before our game until the last gasp Sunderland equaliser. If that win would have happened, even in spite of our win yesterday, they would still have been six points clear. Now its down to four. That and the way we destroyed Liverpool yesterday is bound to have their arses twitching a bit.
Half of our team know what winning the title is like, half of the Tarquins know what bottling it is like.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top