My thoughts aren’t about whether Liverpool did it, (they clearly did), but why only 1m, why NDA... as ever there’s more than just the info which was originally reported, and now it leaks 6 years later.You don’t pay £1mill if you are confident your employees are innocent. And you have enough information that the accusers are also guilty of something. Hi
It just feels that Liverpool got a good ‘deal’, and either there’s a lot more in it that’s not disclosed still, that’s positive for us (hopefully)... or there’s something unknown that made the agreement such a good ‘win’ for Liverpool (despite them being entirely in the wrong) on the single act of multiple times accessing City data).