EL APACHE TEVEZ
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Sep 2008
- Messages
- 21,958
How the mighty have fallen.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Liverpool Thread 2013/14
- Thread starter LoveCity
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
George Hannah
Well-Known Member
It's all a cruel lie apparently
malg
Well-Known Member
Depending on the buyer, this could be excellent news for Liverpool. Oil investment is what they're after and not Yanks.
Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
It strikes me as a carefully worded denial but I could be reading too much into it.
Despite them being one of the clubs screaming for a true break-even requirement, they've made nearly £100m losses in the past two years and the owners have put an additional £50m cash in. They won't carry on doing that ad infinitum but with the extra TV money coming in from this season I'd be surprised if they didn't give it at least one more year.
Despite them being one of the clubs screaming for a true break-even requirement, they've made nearly £100m losses in the past two years and the owners have put an additional £50m cash in. They won't carry on doing that ad infinitum but with the extra TV money coming in from this season I'd be surprised if they didn't give it at least one more year.
Why Always Ste
Well-Known Member
Haha just doing a search for "Aramco" on Twitter, you can read many comments from fans of other clubs begging Aramco to takeover their club(s).
Show's how hypocritical and jealous they are.
Show's how hypocritical and jealous they are.
Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
It won't happen as I'm sure their fans would be protesting loudly if they were taken over by Saudi oil billionaires.Why Always Ste said:Haha just doing a search for "Aramco" on Twitter, you can read many comments from fans of other clubs begging Aramco to takeover their club(s).
Show's how hypocritical and jealous they are.
In the land of Barcodes
Well-Known Member
I'm afraid I just can't see it. I could be wrong but why announce a £260m redevelopment and then sell it before you start getting money back.
I think FSG are there for the duration - they just have to alter where they believe the club should be in terms of the Premier League and Europe. They've spent £186m on players - well mostly crap, let's face it. That's been the problem.
I think FSG are there for the duration - they just have to alter where they believe the club should be in terms of the Premier League and Europe. They've spent £186m on players - well mostly crap, let's face it. That's been the problem.
Kun Aguero said:Bill Shankley was vastly overrated, 8 trophies in 14 years(one was winning the fizzy pop league.), Mancini has a better trophy ratio. Bob Paisley is the person who deserves all the credit. Discuss.
That's quite laughable.
Salford_Blue
Well-Known Member
To be able to compete for the elite players in the future, Liverpool need to find ways of making money and quickly, because as long as FFP is in place, it doesn't matter how many zillions a new owner has; they will never be allowed to invest beyond what they are allowed to.
They know that Suarez is the last 'cash cow' ticket that they hold so they are (quite rightly) holding out for as much as possible. God knows they need it after blowing all the Torres money on average players, who didn't improve them one jot. And where are they going to find the next Gerrard, because anyone outside of Anfield knows that Allen or Henderson aint gonna fill them boots.
And as long as Liverpool finish outside the Top 4/6, do you honestly think that Sturridge and Coutinho will want to hang around forever, when the bigger teams, with bigger wages and a guarantee of Chumps League, come knocking?
True, they will make money on them, but at the moment, Liverpool are all about taking a gamble on kids with promise, in the hope that they can develop them enough to make a decent profit on them, which will increase their revenue, which will allow them to invest in better players. But this aint gonna happen overnight.
Said it before, but those who voted for FFP solely see their club as a way of making money for themselves. Otherwise, they would have voted against FFP and invested their own money, which Fenway didn't.
Their rhetoric about how clubs should be run is only there to mask what they are really doing and are making chumps out of their fans.
They know that Suarez is the last 'cash cow' ticket that they hold so they are (quite rightly) holding out for as much as possible. God knows they need it after blowing all the Torres money on average players, who didn't improve them one jot. And where are they going to find the next Gerrard, because anyone outside of Anfield knows that Allen or Henderson aint gonna fill them boots.
And as long as Liverpool finish outside the Top 4/6, do you honestly think that Sturridge and Coutinho will want to hang around forever, when the bigger teams, with bigger wages and a guarantee of Chumps League, come knocking?
True, they will make money on them, but at the moment, Liverpool are all about taking a gamble on kids with promise, in the hope that they can develop them enough to make a decent profit on them, which will increase their revenue, which will allow them to invest in better players. But this aint gonna happen overnight.
Said it before, but those who voted for FFP solely see their club as a way of making money for themselves. Otherwise, they would have voted against FFP and invested their own money, which Fenway didn't.
Their rhetoric about how clubs should be run is only there to mask what they are really doing and are making chumps out of their fans.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.