Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
They made a cumulative loss of around £90m in the previous 2 years, which is why UEFA investigated them. The additional BT Sport money from the PL will have pulled them in or close to break-even and the CL money might well have put them into profit. They may get something like £20-25m a season from the extra seats in the expanded Main Stand so if all that carried on, they'd be pretty healthy I'd say.roaminblue said:Prestwich_Blue said:And it's got to be paid back within 5 years, via dividends paid to FSG and you can only pay dividends out of profits. Will the new stand's extra capacity generate £30m a year? If it doesn't that'll cramp their spending on players somewhat and they'll have to keep wages down. Plus anyone decent will be sold if they get a good offer.
Actually, I think I'm confusing things. I think the facility was a 3 year which I believe was paid down and, I think, they redrew as an RCF.
The inter-company loan was indeed paid by FSG, and it looks like it topped up an existing credit to them, with sum value circa 69m.
To be honest, their accounts aren't in that bad shape, once they finish their capex (and provided it contributes towards cashflows) they look healthy enough at a cursory glance
But they won't be getting any more CL money for a while (unless they're very lucky) and they'll lose £20m of PL prize money compared to last season if they finish where they are now. You'd also have to question whether a team that can only offer mediocre football and Europa League in a good year will be able to command the premium prices for coprporate facilities that they're looking to achieve. So there's a chance they'll be £50m a season worse off than they might have expected if they were factoring in regular top four finishes and CL income.
And it's quite possible they were relying on a lot of that £50m to pay for the stand.