prestonibbo_mcfc
Well-Known Member
Yes. But it had something to do with Gail Platt, so I won't go there ;-)Did he ever find his rabbit?
Yes. But it had something to do with Gail Platt, so I won't go there ;-)Did he ever find his rabbit?
Question to Mark Lawrenson in the Metro this morning:
Wenger said the financial clout of clubs like Man City is destroying competition, is he right?
This utter thick ****s answer, and I quote!
"Although I think he's probably been there a year too long, I'm a big Wenger fan and I think he is right, City are spending £50 million on full backs and know teams like Arsenal, Liverpool and Spurs can't afford to pay those prices"
Don't get me wrong I've always thought he was an utter prick but it beggars belief the shit, ****s like him are paid to spout unchallenged....!
What Lawrenson meant was that at present Arsenal, Tottenham and Liverpool cannot afford to pay £50 million for a full back. It is undeniable that Man City can as they have done just that very recently. What's the beef with him, he's only stating the truth after all.Question to Mark Lawrenson in the Metro this morning:
Wenger said the financial clout of clubs like Man City is destroying competition, is he right?
This utter thick ****s answer, and I quote!
"Although I think he's probably been there a year too long, I'm a big Wenger fan and I think he is right, City are spending £50 million on full backs and know teams like Arsenal, Liverpool and Spurs can't afford to pay those prices"
Don't get me wrong I've always thought he was an utter prick but it beggars belief the shit, ****s like him are paid to spout unchallenged....!
Are you messaging this from broadmoor?? Lawrenson is a Pratt, I know exactly what he meant and he's full of shit... He fancies himself as a comedian and he's doing great ...!What Lawrenson meant was that at present Arsenal, Tottenham and Liverpool cannot afford to pay £50 million for a full back. It is undeniable that Man City can as they have done just that very recently. What's the beef with him, he's only stating the truth after all.
you have just paid 75m for a cb,if you needed a fb you could have afforded it,it's a myth we will pay whatever we are asked for,see mahrez,also arsenal are a very rich club they just dont lke spending itWhat Lawrenson meant was that at present Arsenal, Tottenham and Liverpool cannot afford to pay £50 million for a full back. It is undeniable that Man City can as they have done just that very recently. What's the beef with him, he's only stating the truth after all.
Don't talk out of your arse palWhat Lawrenson meant was that at present Arsenal, Tottenham and Liverpool cannot afford to pay £50 million for a full back. It is undeniable that Man City can as they have done just that very recently. What's the beef with him, he's only stating the truth after all.
Must good gear your smoking in Liverpool mate, if they wanted, all of the top 6 could afford to pay £50m for a full back, they just chose to spend it on other positionsWhat Lawrenson meant was that at present Arsenal, Tottenham and Liverpool cannot afford to pay £50 million for a full back. It is undeniable that Man City can as they have done just that very recently. What's the beef with him, he's only stating the truth after all.
So can I.I can help but like Lawro.