I would dispute that there have been no injuries to our key players - certainly not to the same extent as City, but we played for the best part of a month with just two fit centre halves, lost our goalkeeper for nearly a quarter of the season and were without Fabinho during our busiest period.
I’m not on a wind-up - I just wanted to come on dispute some of the things being said. Perhaps it’s only natural for you all to try and make excuses for Liverpool being better so far this season (I remember last season we had supporters doing the same, suggesting you were cheating because you had assembled a great squad by spending money) but surely there has to be some acceptance that the team who wins the league does so because they’ve been the best team over a long stretch of games? Would City have been 1st with Laporte and Sané considering the amount of games Liverpool have won?