Without clicking on the tweet, I'm going to guess the replies are a big game of City Bingo?
Edit: I as wrong, it appears to be a United love-in!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Liverpool Thread - 2021/22
- Thread starter MAG
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Without clicking on the tweet, I'm going to guess the replies are a big game of City Bingo?
Edit: I as wrong, it appears to be a United love-in!
citizen_maine
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 May 2011
- Messages
- 14,430
Basically, they're not very good at getting more points than other teams
Colin Bells Boots
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 18,166
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Saying how you feel without following the crowd on here, I respect that. You will win the league by the way, even if you lose a game your goal difference is comfortably superior at this stage.
well there is currently 1 decent dipper supporting poster on the forum ( not you btw ) so is that a fair representation of your " supporters " ?
Blueboy73
Well-Known Member
Oh I forgot about that.What about the Flintoff and SWP money , we havent touched that yet
While we're at it can we add the Gio Kinkldze and Paul Stewart money?
Mazzarelli's Swiss Cheese
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Apr 2019
- Messages
- 18,622
- Team supported
- FC Zurich (and city of course)
Just goes to show what an uncompetitive one horse race the pl was back then - it seems the rags 'ruined football'?
blueish swede
Well-Known Member
jimharri
Moderator
Is there? I must have missed him/her.well there is currently 1 decent dipper supporting poster on the forum ( not you btw ) so is that a fair representation of your " supporters " ?
;-)
Platt Lane veteran
Well-Known Member
That would have been a tough choice, but yeah, on reflection, I’m with you.I'm just glad the rags didn't get to the cup final instead of Chelsea.
I'd have wanted the rags to win.
I might be wrong, according to transfermarket.com, he was bought for £12 mil, I think he stayed 4 seasons for 80k a week (estimated) so that is £28,640,000 combined fee and wages.
Sold for £120 mil, take off his costs, leaves £91,360,000. VVD was bought for £75 mil, been her 4 seasons at 150k a week (estimated), so combined VVD has cost them £106,620,000. So buying VVD alone are at a £14,840,000 nevermind all this coutinho money bought x,y,z.
I might be wrong, according to transfermarket.com, he was bought for £12 mil, I think he stayed 4 seasons for 80k a week (estimated) so that is £28,640,000 combined fee and wages.
Sold for £120 mil, take off his costs, leaves £91,360,000. VVD was bought for £75 mil, been her 4 seasons at 150k a week (estimated), so combined VVD has cost them £106,620,000. So buying VVD alone are at a £14,840,000 nevermind all this coutinho money bought x,y,z.
What they all seem to forget. A good chunk of the Courtinho fee will have been based on performance. He’s stunk the place out, so they’ll have only got the base figure.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.