Liverpool Thread - 2021/22

[Ajm1985]

Fucking state of this

That's one of the grimmest things I've seen - particularly from a fanbase that demands that everyone appreciates and supports their mourning. Honestly surprised by it.

 

[Bluechipblue]

That's one of the grimmest things I've seen - particularly from a fanbase that demands that everyone appreciates and supports their mourning. Honestly surprised by it.

A word to the wise. Never underestimate how low these c***s can stoop to.

 

[Eds]

A word to the wise. Never underestimate how low these c***s can stoop to.

Lower than a snake's belly in most cases.

 

[feedmpenzaandhewillscore]

And it seems to be you live your life like a candle in the wind.

Salah thought he’d won the title, then City win!

 

[waspish]

Seems the right back at Aberdeen Ramsay maybe with the salah situation Klopp thinking about playing Trent in that position he seems to always push right up in games now. 3m though that’s cheap is he any good never seen him play must this money ball shit the scouse use.

 

[KPXBLN]

I'm probably pissing in the wind but several people here need to educate themselves about what actually happened at Hillsborough. Whether or not there were fake tickets in Paris, and/or people trying to jib in without tickets, that's got absolutely nothing to do with what happened in '89. You can apprise yourself of the facts without loving LFC, the smoke the media blow up their arses, or their #ThisMeansMore self-mythologies. It's just a matter of respect for fellow football fans who died. Here's a 40 minute lecture by a QC which is comprehensive.

 

[Paladin]

I'm probably pissing in the wind but several people here need to educate themselves about what actually happened at Hillsborough. Whether or not there were fake tickets in Paris, and/or people trying to jib in without tickets, that's got absolutely nothing to do with what happened in '89. You can apprise yourself of the facts without loving LFC, the smoke the media blow up their arses, or their #ThisMeansMore self-mythologies. It's just a matter of respect for fellow football fans who died. Here's a 40 minute lecture by a QC which is comprehensive.

You're not. Most football fans, including City fans are aware of what happened at Hillsborough, and who was to blame.

What we don't agree with though, is that in the light of Liverpool's history, why do their fans continue to try to gain illegal access to football matches, resulting in overcrowding? Why do other Liverpool fans tolerate it? Why does the club encourage it? And when things go wrong as a result, why do Liverpool fans try to absolve themselves of all liability?

 

[mexico1970]

I'm probably pissing in the wind but several people here need to educate themselves about what actually happened at Hillsborough. Whether or not there were fake tickets in Paris, and/or people trying to jib in without tickets, that's got absolutely nothing to do with what happened in '89. You can apprise yourself of the facts without loving LFC, the smoke the media blow up their arses, or their #ThisMeansMore self-mythologies. It's just a matter of respect for fellow football fans who died. Here's a 40 minute lecture by a QC which is comprehensive.

Yes you are pissing in the wind, why are you pissing in the wind?

It's the cult of scouse and their media friends who drew the comparison between what happened in Paris and Hillsborough, they didn't compare the 2 events with Heysel for some reason.

It was even said that due to the scousers behaviour another Hillsborough was prevented, this prompted people to ask uncomfortable questions of liverpool and we all know they don't like answering questions.

If liverpool had any respect for anything they'd pump as much grief into the 39 fans they killed but they wont, the club is shit from top to bottom.

 

[KPXBLN]

You're not. Most football fans, including City fans are aware of what happened at Hillsborough, and who was to blame.

What we don't agree with though, is that in the light of Liverpool's history, why do their fans continue to try to gain illegal access to football matches, resulting in overcrowding? Why do other Liverpool fans tolerate it? Why does the club encourage it? And when things go wrong as a result, why do Liverpool fans try to absolve themselves of all liability?

What I'm disputing is the connection between these two things. Hillsborough was not a consequence of overcrowding. The Leppings Lane end as a whole was not overcrowded - the number of people in the stand at 3pm did not exceed the number of tickets sold. The problem was that because of the failure of the police to manage the crowd properly on the day, fans were directed overwhelmingly into the two central pens while the side pens were significantly under capacity.

I'd also add that UEFA and the French government have changed their story so many times already; I don't know why you'd trust them. First there was '30,000-40,000 fake tickets.' Now it's about 2,000. You really think that 2,000 fake tickets caused those scenes?

 

[KPXBLN]

Yes you are pissing in the wind, why are you pissing in the wind?

It's the cult of scouse and their media friends who drew the comparison between what happened in Paris and Hillsborough, they didn't compare the 2 events with Heysel for some reason.

It was even said that due to the scousers behaviour another Hillsborough was prevented, this prompted people to ask uncomfortable questions of liverpool and we all know they don't like answering questions.

If liverpool had any respect for anything they'd pump as much grief into the 39 fans they killed but they wont, the club is shit from top to bottom.

Well, maybe I am with you. You seem to think that Hillsborough should prompt 'uncomfortable questions' of Liverpool. Like I say, if you want to know what actually happened I recommend the video.