RadcliffeRick
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Oct 2011
- Messages
- 9,177
- Location
- Kuala Lumpur Via Radcliffe
- Team supported
- Manchester City since 2008 Chelsea before that :-)
Especially when they have asjednhim!!!Beginning of the end
Especially when they have asjednhim!!!Beginning of the end
How long before their feral fan base start with the death threats?Beginning of the end
Means Asthmatic in Egyptian....Especially when they have asjednhim!!!
But they did have a 'Victory Parade' on the anniversary of the Heysel disaster. That is exactly how much grief they have for the 39 dead fans in other words: absolutely zero. The date of the anniversary of Heysel meant nothing to them at all. Not even a third thought, never mind a second one. It didn't happen in their eyes. They have totally and blatantly ignored it. And with a compliant, supportive media it has literally gone away. To my knowledge not one single media outlet made a single comment about Liverpool's victory parade being held on the anniversary date of Heysel. None. For LFC to do what they did on that date is unforgivable. However, it sums them up to an absolute tee.Yes you are pissing in the wind, why are you pissing in the wind?
It's the cult of scouse and their media friends who drew the comparison between what happened in Paris and Hillsborough, they didn't compare the 2 events with Heysel for some reason.
It was even said that due to the scousers behaviour another Hillsborough was prevented, this prompted people to ask uncomfortable questions of liverpool and we all know they don't like answering questions.
If liverpool had any respect for anything they'd pump as much grief into the 39 fans they killed but they wont, the club is shit from top to bottom.
Beginning of the end
I don't think paper tickets is unusual.Still waiting.
I'll ask you this question again.
'Why did Liverpool Football Club insist on paper tickets instead of digital tickets?'
The daily mail would love that in their comments section ;+)You're not. Most football fans, including City fans are aware of what happened at Hillsborough, and who was to blame.
What we don't agree with though, is that in the light of Liverpool's history, why do their fans continue to try to gain illegal access to football matches, resulting in overcrowding? Why do other Liverpool fans tolerate it? Why does the club encourage it? And when things go wrong as a result, why do Liverpool fans try to absolve themselves of all liability?
Nobody has said there were 20,000 40,000 fake tickets ,the french are quoting 2800ish fakes if they have got as far as the turnstiles before being found then that is a big problem to sortWhat I'm disputing is the connection between these two things. Hillsborough was not a consequence of overcrowding. The Leppings Lane end as a whole was not overcrowded - the number of people in the stand at 3pm did not exceed the number of tickets sold. The problem was that because of the failure of the police to manage the crowd properly on the day, fans were directed overwhelmingly into the two central pens while the side pens were significantly under capacity.
I'd also add that UEFA and the French government have changed their story so many times already; I don't know why you'd trust them. First there was '30,000-40,000 fake tickets.' Now it's about 2,000. You really think that 2,000 fake tickets caused those scenes?